Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
IWF vs SIVR: Differences, Returns & Fees
IWF is an equity index fund and SIVR a commodity fund, and over the year to Oct 28, 2026, SIVR returned +15.0% against +0.9%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about IWF and SIVR
Net assets: $124.7bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF, and $3.7bn on Oct 28, 2026 for abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF.
Pair scorecard
IWF costs 0.12 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 14.1 points.
| Measure | IWF | SIVR |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +0.9% | +15.0% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 4.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | 53.5%, high on Jan 28, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Russell 1000 Growth Index | Silver |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.18% | 0.30% |
| Net assets, IWF as of Oct 27, 2026 and SIVR as of Oct 28, 2026 | $124.7bn | $3.7bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 94% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 57.5% | |
Risk and return
Jul 31, 2009 to Oct 23, 2026 · 899 weekly returnsEach against its own benchmark: IWF against VONG, Oct 1, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026; SIVR against SLV, Jul 31, 2009 to Oct 23, 2026.
IWF returned more: +1,214.2% to +267.1%. IWF swung less: 17.9% to 31.0%. IWF fell less at its worst: −32.5% to −74.7%.
Full scorecard
19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | IWF | SIVR | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +1,214.2% | +267.1% | IWF | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +16.1% | +7.8% | IWF | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +992.1% | +267.1% | IWF | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 17.9% | 31.0% | IWF | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 12.0% | 21.3% | IWF | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −32.5% | −74.7% | IWF | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Upside capture | 99.8% | 99.6% | Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose. | |
| Downside capture | 100.1% | 99.8% | Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better. | |
| Beta | 1.00 | 1.00 | Not an edge | How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves. |
| R squared | 1.00 | 1.00 | Not an edge | Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.84 | 0.35 | IWF | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 1.25 | 0.51 | IWF | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Treynor | 0.149 | 0.109 | Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta. | |
| Calmar | 0.49 | 0.10 | IWF | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
| Against the benchmark | ||||
| Benchmark | VONG | SLV | The ETF each fund is measured against. | |
| Alpha | −0.1% a year | +0.2% a year | Not significant | Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts. |
| Alpha t-stat | −0.58 | 0.96 | Not an edge | How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance. |
| Alpha range | −0.6% to +0.3% | −0.2% to +0.6% | Includes zero | The 95% range for the yearly alpha. |
| Information ratio | −0.11 | 0.19 | Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error. | |
| Tracking error | 1.0% | 0.8% | Not an edge | How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 899 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
Side by side
IWF and SIVR on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IWF and SIVR do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. IWF follows Russell 1000 Growth Index and SIVR follows Silver.
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 IWF returned +0.9% and SIVR +15.0% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 14.1 points.
- Cost. IWF charges 0.18% of assets a year and SIVR 0.30%, a gap of 0.12 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
IWF
IWF tracks the Russell 1000 growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +0.9% with distributions reinvested, against +1.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 374 positions, with the top ten at 57.5%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Its expense ratio is 0.30% a year, for the three months to Jun 30, 2026, as its 10-Q states.
SIVR holds silver. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.0% with distributions reinvested, against +14.9% for its benchmark, the price of silver. It sat 53.5% below its high of Jan 28, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWF or SIVR?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWF returned +0.9% and SIVR +15.0%.
- Which is cheaper, IWF or SIVR?
- IWF is cheaper, by 0.12 percentage points a year. That is about $12 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IWF against SIVR, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwf-vs-sivr
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). IWF against SIVR. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwf-vs-sivr
[IWF against SIVR (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwf-vs-sivr)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.