Which returned more over the last year, BWET or QQQ?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BWET returned +5129.6% and QQQ returned +23.0%, so BWET returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, BWET or QQQ?

BWET charges 0.15% a year and QQQ charges 0.18%, so BWET is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BWET vs QQQ: how they differ

BWET is a commodity fund and QQQ an equity index fund, and over the year BWET returned more, +5129.6% against +23.0%.

Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF and Invesco QQQ Trust.

BWET and QQQ on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF	QQQ Invesco QQQ Trust
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Breakwave	Invesco
What it is	Tanker Shipping	Nasdaq-100
Total return, 1 year	+5129.6%	+23.0%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+5112.1 pts	+5.5 pts
Expense ratio	0.15%	0.18%
Holdings	not filed	105

BWET in plain words

BWET is a commodity fund tracking the Tanker Shipping. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +5129.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

QQQ in plain words

QQQ is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 105 positions, with the top ten at 47.0%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BWET or QQQ?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BWET returned +5129.6% and QQQ returned +23.0%, so BWET returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, BWET or QQQ?: BWET charges 0.15% a year and QQQ charges 0.18%, so BWET is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BWET against QQQ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BWET against QQQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bwet-vs-qqq Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources