IQ

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

BWET vs SCHG: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

BWET is a commodity futures fund and SCHG an equity index fund, and over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BWET returned +5,121.7% against +6.8%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BWET and SCHG

Net assets: $178m on Oct 28, 2026 for Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF, and $63.0bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF.

BWET on its own →SCHG on its own →
At a glance
+5,121.7%
BWET total return, 1 year
+6.8%
SCHG total return, 1 year
4.68%
BWET expense ratio
0.04%
SCHG expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SCHG costs 4.64 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5114.9 points.

BWET vs SCHG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBWETSCHG
Return
Total return, 1 year+5,121.7%+6.8%
Drawdown
Below its high11.2%, high on Oct 8, 20263.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksTanker freight futuresDow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio4.68%0.04%
Net assets, BWET as of Oct 28, 2026 and SCHG as of Aug 31, 2026$178m$63.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
In the S&P 500, by weight95%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund51.0%

Method

Side by side

BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
Where it sits Commodity ETF Stock ETF
Issuer Breakwave Schwab
What it is Holds tanker freight futures Tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap Growth
Total return, 1 year +5,121.7% +6.8%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +13.7% (IVV)
Gap to its benchmark not measured −6.9 pts vs IVV
Expense ratio 4.68% 0.04%
Holdings not counted 192
Net assets, BWET as of Oct 28, 2026 and SCHG as of Aug 31, 2026 $178m $63.0bn

BWET and SCHG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

BWET flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BWET

Its expense ratio is 4.68%, for the year to Jun 30, 2026, as its 10-K states.

BWET holds tanker freight futures. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +5,121.7% with distributions reinvested. It sat 11.2% below its high of Oct 8, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

SCHG

SCHG tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +6.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 192 positions, with the top ten at 51.0%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BWET or SCHG?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BWET returned +5,121.7% and SCHG +6.8%.
Which is cheaper, BWET or SCHG?
SCHG is cheaper, by 4.64 percentage points a year. That is about $464 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.
Other comparisons
BWET vs MGKBWET vs VOOGBWET vs ONEQBWET vs QQQSCHG vs USOSCHG vs SIVRSCHG vs SLVGLDM vs SCHG
Where to next
BWET on its own →SCHG on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →SCHG dividend history →SCHG holdings →Standards and sources →
Sources and dates
Breakwave page for BWET ↗
SCHG filings on SEC EDGAR ↗
SCHG prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗
Schwab website ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BWET against SCHG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bwet-vs-schg

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.