Which returned more over the last year, BSCW or SUSC?

In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSCW returned −1.1% and SUSC −2.1%.

Which is cheaper, BSCW or SUSC?

BSCW is cheaper, by 0.08 percentage points a year. That is about $8 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF

Compare their flows Ask IQ about these two funds

BSCW vs SUSC: Differences, Returns & Fees

On May 31, 2026 BSCW's duration was 5.1 years and SUSC's 6.7; BSCW charges 0.10% to SUSC's 0.18%. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $1.5bn for Invesco BulletShares 2032 Corporate Bond ETF and $1.3bn for iShares ESG Aware USD Corporate Bond ETF.

BSCW costs 0.08 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.0 point; BSCW is 1.2 times larger.

BSCW vs SUSC: Differences, Returns & Fees
	BSCW	SUSC
Expense ratio	0.10%	0.18%
Net assets	$1.5bn	$1.3bn
Total return, 1 year	−1.1%	−2.1%
What it tracks	Invesco BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2032 Index	Bloomberg MSCI US Corporate ESG Focus Index
Holdings in common	3%
Below its high	3.8%, high on Feb 27, 2026	4.5%, high on Aug 3, 2021

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026.

−1.1%

BSCW total return, 1 year

−2.1%

SUSC total return, 1 year

0.10%

BSCW expense ratio

0.18%

SUSC expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BSCW and SUSC hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

50%

half

3% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding BSCW SUSC

Zoetis Inc., due Nov 16, 2032 0.28% 0.09%

AerCap Ireland Capital DAC / AerCap Global Aviation Trust, due Jan 30, 2032 1.31% 0.07%

Diageo Capital PLC, due Apr 29, 2032 0.23% 0.07%

Williams Cos., Inc. (The), due Aug 15, 2032 0.35% 0.07%

Clorox Co. (The), due May 1, 2032 0.21% 0.07%

Morgan Stanley, due Apr 1, 2032 0.40% 0.07%

Synopsys, Inc., due Apr 1, 2032 0.54% 0.06%

Weyerhaeuser Co., due Mar 15, 2032 0.26% 0.06%

FactSet Research Systems Inc., due Mar 1, 2032 0.16% 0.06%

Workday, Inc., due Apr 1, 2032 0.42% 0.06%

General Electric Co., due Mar 15, 2032 0.52% 0.06%

UBS Americas Inc., due Jul 15, 2032 0.30% 0.05%

Only in BSCW

Meta Platforms, Inc., due Nov 15, 2032 1.42%

Oracle Corp., due Sep 26, 2032 1.03%

Meta Platforms, Inc., due Aug 15, 2032 1.01%

Amazon.com, Inc., due Apr 13, 2032 0.85%

AT&T Inc., due Feb 1, 2032 0.78%

Block, Inc., due May 15, 2032 0.73%

Haleon US Capital LLC, due Mar 24, 2032 0.67%

GE HealthCare Technologies Inc., due Nov 22, 2032 0.66%

Only in SUSC

Salesforce Inc, due Apr 11, 2028 0.35%

Avangrid Inc, due Jun 1, 2029 0.34%

Automatic Data Processing Inc, due May 15, 2028 0.34%

National Bank of Canada, due Dec 18, 2028 0.30%

Automatic Data Processing Inc, due Sep 1, 2030 0.27%

NextEra Energy Capital Holdings Inc, due Nov 1, 2029 0.24%

Cheniere Energy Inc, due Oct 15, 2028 0.24%

Digital Realty Trust LP, due Jul 15, 2028 0.23%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

BSCW

Invesco BulletShares 2032 Corporate Bond ETF

SUSC

iShares ESG Aware USD Corporate Bond ETF

Where it sits Bond ETF Bond ETF

Issuer Invesco iShares

What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index

Total return, 1 year −1.1% −2.1%

Expense ratio 0.10% 0.18%

Holdings 327 3958

Net assets $1.5bn $1.3bn

BSCW and SUSC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About BSCW

BSCW tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned −1.1% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year. It sat 3.8% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

About SUSC

SUSC tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned −2.1% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. It sat 4.5% below its high of Aug 3, 2021 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BSCW or SUSC?: In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSCW returned −1.1% and SUSC −2.1%.
Which is cheaper, BSCW or SUSC?: BSCW is cheaper, by 0.08 percentage points a year. That is about $8 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

BSCW vs QLTA BSCW vs IGEB BSCW vs SPBO BSCW vs SCHI SUSC vs VTC SUSC vs VCEB IBDY vs SUSC BSCX vs SUSC

BSCW on its own →SUSC on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

BSCW filings on SEC EDGAR ↗BSCW prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Invesco page for BSCW ↗SUSC filings on SEC EDGAR ↗SUSC prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗iShares page for SUSC ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BSCW against SUSC, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bscw-vs-susc

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.