Which returned more over the last year, BSCX or SUSC?

In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSCX returned −1.6% and SUSC −2.1%.

Which is cheaper, BSCX or SUSC?

BSCX is cheaper, by 0.08 percentage points a year. That is about $8 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF

Compare their flows Ask IQ about these two funds

BSCX vs SUSC: Differences, Returns & Fees

On May 31, 2026 BSCX's duration was 5.7 years and SUSC's 6.7; BSCX charges 0.10% to SUSC's 0.18%. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $1.1bn for Invesco BulletShares 2033 Corporate Bond ETF and $1.3bn for iShares ESG Aware USD Corporate Bond ETF.

BSCX costs 0.08 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.5 points; SUSC is 1.2 times larger.

BSCX vs SUSC: Differences, Returns & Fees
	BSCX	SUSC
Expense ratio	0.10%	0.18%
Net assets	$1.1bn	$1.3bn
Total return, 1 year	−1.6%	−2.1%
What it tracks	Invesco BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2033 Index	Bloomberg MSCI US Corporate ESG Focus Index
Holdings in common	4%
Below its high	4.2%, high on Feb 27, 2026	4.5%, high on Aug 3, 2021

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026.

−1.6%

BSCX total return, 1 year

−2.1%

SUSC total return, 1 year

0.10%

BSCX expense ratio

0.18%

SUSC expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BSCX and SUSC hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

50%

half

4% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding BSCX SUSC

Tractor Supply Co., due May 15, 2033 0.28% 0.15%

Jacobs Engineering Group Inc., due Mar 1, 2033 0.19% 0.15%

LKQ Corp., due Jun 15, 2033 0.22% 0.14%

National Grid PLC, due Jun 12, 2033 0.31% 0.14%

Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc., due Jun 1, 2033 0.23% 0.10%

Intuit Inc., due Sep 15, 2033 0.47% 0.09%

TRANE TECHNOLOGIES FINANCING Ltd., due Mar 3, 2033 0.26% 0.09%

Veralto Corp., due Sep 18, 2033 0.26% 0.09%

Ryder System, Inc., due Dec 1, 2033 0.23% 0.09%

Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (The), due Feb 15, 2033 0.41% 0.08%

Amgen Inc., due Mar 2, 2033 1.60% 0.08%

Gilead Sciences, Inc., due Oct 15, 2033 0.38% 0.07%

Only in BSCX

Amazon.com, Inc., due Mar 13, 2033 1.46%

AT&T Inc., due Dec 1, 2033 1.17%

Oracle Corp., due May 4, 2033 1.09%

Alphabet Inc., due Feb 15, 2033 1.09%

Salesforce, Inc., due Mar 15, 2033 1.02%

Abbott Laboratories, due Mar 15, 2033 0.98%

T-Mobile USA, Inc., due Jul 15, 2033 0.96%

Philip Morris International Inc., due Feb 15, 2033 0.85%

Only in SUSC

Salesforce Inc, due Apr 11, 2028 0.35%

Avangrid Inc, due Jun 1, 2029 0.34%

Automatic Data Processing Inc, due May 15, 2028 0.34%

National Bank of Canada, due Dec 18, 2028 0.30%

Automatic Data Processing Inc, due Sep 1, 2030 0.27%

NextEra Energy Capital Holdings Inc, due Nov 1, 2029 0.24%

Cheniere Energy Inc, due Oct 15, 2028 0.24%

Digital Realty Trust LP, due Jul 15, 2028 0.23%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

BSCX

Invesco BulletShares 2033 Corporate Bond ETF

SUSC

iShares ESG Aware USD Corporate Bond ETF

Where it sits Bond ETF Bond ETF

Issuer Invesco iShares

What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index

Total return, 1 year −1.6% −2.1%

Expense ratio 0.10% 0.18%

Holdings 324 3958

Net assets $1.1bn $1.3bn

BSCX and SUSC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About BSCX

BSCX tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned −1.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year. It sat 4.2% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

About SUSC

SUSC tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned −2.1% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. It sat 4.5% below its high of Aug 3, 2021 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BSCX or SUSC?: In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSCX returned −1.6% and SUSC −2.1%.
Which is cheaper, BSCX or SUSC?: BSCX is cheaper, by 0.08 percentage points a year. That is about $8 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

BSCX vs SPBO BSCX vs VCIT BSCX vs VCEB BSCX vs QLTA SUSC vs UCON SUSC vs USIG IBDY vs SUSC QLTA vs SUSC

BSCX on its own →SUSC on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

BSCX filings on SEC EDGAR ↗BSCX prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Invesco page for BSCX ↗SUSC filings on SEC EDGAR ↗SUSC prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗iShares page for SUSC ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BSCX against SUSC, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bscx-vs-susc

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.