Which returned more over the last year, BSCQ or GBIL?

In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSCQ returned +3.8% and GBIL +3.6%.

Which is cheaper, BSCQ or GBIL?

BSCQ is cheaper, by 0.02 percentage points a year. That is about $2 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF

Compare their flows Ask IQ about these two funds

BSCQ vs GBIL: Differences, Returns & Fees

On May 31, 2026 BSCQ's duration was 0.3 years and GBIL's 0.4; BSCQ charges 0.10% to GBIL's 0.12%. Net assets: $3.1bn on Oct 20, 2026 for Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF, and $7.9bn on Oct 19, 2026 for Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF.

Ask IQ about this page

Ask IQ about BSCQ and GBIL

Answers cite the figures on this page.

BSCQ costs 0.02 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.2 points; GBIL is 2.5 times larger.

BSCQ vs GBIL: Differences, Returns & Fees
	BSCQ	GBIL
Expense ratio	0.10%	0.12%
Net assets, as of Oct 19, 2026	$3.1bn	$7.9bn
Total return, 1 year	+3.8%	+3.6%
What it tracks	not read by ETFIQ	not read by ETFIQ
Holdings in common	0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026.

+3.8%

BSCQ total return, 1 year

+3.6%

GBIL total return, 1 year

0.10%

BSCQ expense ratio

0.12%

GBIL expense ratio

Client brief · page 1 of 2Report BR-812FB5F3D7

BSCQ and GBIL are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated May 31, 2026).
What each follows (similar). Both follow not read by ETFIQ.
One-year total return (similar). Over 1 year to Oct 20, 2026 BSCQ returned +3.8% and GBIL +3.6% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 0.2 points.

Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.

Take this comparison to a client

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BSCQ and GBIL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

50%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding BSCQ GBIL

Only in BSCQ

Microsoft Corp., due Aug 8, 2026 1.73%

AbbVie Inc., due Nov 21, 2026 1.73%

AerCap Ireland Capital DAC / AerCap Global Aviation Trust, due Oct 29, 2026 1.62%

Wells Fargo & Co., due Oct 23, 2026 1.31%

Oracle Corp., due Jul 15, 2026 1.30%

Morgan Stanley, due Jul 27, 2026 1.12%

JPMorgan Chase & Co., due Oct 1, 2026 1.12%

Citigroup Inc., due Oct 21, 2026 1.12%

Only in GBIL

B 0 08/27/26, due Aug 27, 2026 9.32%

B 0 09/22/26, due Sep 22, 2026 7.64%

WIB 0 07/16/26, due Jul 16, 2026 6.33%

B 0 07/21/26, due Jul 21, 2026 6.33%

T 4.125 01/31/27, due Jan 31, 2027 4.67%

T 3.5 09/30/26, due Sep 30, 2026 3.84%

T 3.875 03/31/27, due Mar 31, 2027 3.67%

T 3.75 04/30/27, due Apr 30, 2027 3.67%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

BSCQ

Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF

GBIL

Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF

Where it sits Bond ETF Bond ETF

Issuer Invesco Goldman Sachs

What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index

Total return, 1 year +3.8% +3.6%

Expense ratio 0.10% 0.12%

Holdings 64 43

Net assets, BSCQ as of Oct 20, 2026 and GBIL as of Oct 19, 2026 $3.1bn $7.9bn

BSCQ and GBIL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About BSCQ

BSCQ tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year.

About GBIL

GBIL tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.12% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BSCQ or GBIL?: In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSCQ returned +3.8% and GBIL +3.6%.
Which is cheaper, BSCQ or GBIL?: BSCQ is cheaper, by 0.02 percentage points a year. That is about $2 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

BSCQ vs FTSM BSCQ vs PULS BSCQ vs SHV BSCQ vs TBLL FLRN vs GBIL GBIL vs IBDR GBIL vs VNLA GBIL vs TBLL

BSCQ on its own →GBIL on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →BSCQ dividend history →BSCQ holdings →GBIL dividend history →GBIL holdings →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

BSCQ filings on SEC EDGAR ↗BSCQ prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Invesco page for BSCQ ↗GBIL filings on SEC EDGAR ↗GBIL prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Goldman Sachs website ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BSCQ against GBIL, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bscq-vs-gbil

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.