A
vs
B
Share
Compare their flowsAsk IQ about these two funds

DUSB vs GBIL: Differences, Returns & Fees

DUSB's duration was 0.9 years on Jul 31, 2026 and GBIL's 0.4 on May 31, 2026; GBIL charges 0.12% to DUSB's 0.15%. Net assets: $2.2bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF, and $7.9bn on Oct 19, 2026 for Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF.

Ask IQ about this page

Ask IQ about DUSB and GBIL

Answers cite the figures on this page.

GBIL costs 0.03 points a year less; both returned +3.6% over a year.

DUSB vs GBIL: Differences, Returns & Fees
DUSBGBIL
Expense ratio0.15%0.12%
Net assets, DUSB as of Jul 31, 2026 and GBIL as of Oct 19, 2026$2.2bn$7.9bn
Total return, 1 year+3.6%+3.6%
What it tracksNo index, actively managednot read by ETFIQ
Holdings in commonreport dates differ

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

+3.6%
DUSB total return, 1 year
+3.6%
GBIL total return, 1 year
0.15%
DUSB expense ratio
0.12%
GBIL expense ratio

Get the week's ETF fund flows by email, every Monday.

Plus the Friday ETF note. Confirm from the link that arrives, and unsubscribe in one click. See Privacy.

Client brief · page 1 of 2Report BR-DE2C9992D5

DUSB and GBIL are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. DUSB follows No index, actively managed and GBIL follows not read by ETFIQ.
  2. Number of holdings. DUSB holds 564 positions and GBIL holds 43.
  3. Size. DUSB has $2.2bn in net assets and GBIL $7.9bn (net assets, DUSB as of Jul 31, 2026 and GBIL as of Oct 19, 2026); GBIL is 3.6 times larger.

Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.

Take this comparison to a client

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.

On the same fields

DUSB
Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF
GBIL
Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Bond ETF
Issuer Dimensional Goldman Sachs
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +3.6% +3.6%
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.12%
Holdings 564 43
Net assets, DUSB as of Jul 31, 2026 and GBIL as of Oct 19, 2026 $2.2bn $7.9bn

DUSB and GBIL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About DUSB

DUSB is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

About GBIL

GBIL tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.12% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DUSB or GBIL?
In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DUSB returned +3.6% and GBIL +3.6%.
Which is cheaper, DUSB or GBIL?
GBIL is cheaper, by 0.03 percentage points a year. That is about $3 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
DUSB vs FTSMDUSB vs USFRDUSB vs PULSDUSB vs SHVGBIL vs TBUXGBIL vs XHLFGBIL vs VRIGGBIL vs IBTG
DUSB on its own →GBIL on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →DUSB dividend history →DUSB holdings →GBIL dividend history →GBIL holdings →Standards and sources →
Where these figures came from
DUSB filings on SEC EDGAR ↗DUSB prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Dimensional website ↗GBIL filings on SEC EDGAR ↗GBIL prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Goldman Sachs website ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, DUSB against GBIL, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dusb-vs-gbil

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.