Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

BOND vs XLU: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BOND returned −1.4% to XLU's −3.0%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BOND and XLU

Net assets: $8.3bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund, and $23.9bn on Oct 27, 2026 for State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF.

At a glance
−1.4%
BOND total return, 1 year
−3.0%
XLU total return, 1 year
0.54%
BOND expense ratio
0.08%
XLU expense ratio

Pair scorecard

XLU costs 0.46 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.6 points.

BOND vs XLU: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBONDXLU
Return
Total return, 1 year−1.4%−3.0%
Drawdown
Below its high3.1%, high on Feb 27, 20269.1%, high on Feb 27, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedUtilities Select Sector Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.54%0.08%
Net assets, BOND as of Jun 30, 2026 and XLU as of Oct 27, 2026$8.3bn$23.9bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight100%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund58.7%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Mar 9, 2012 to Oct 23, 2026 · 763 weekly returns
BOND XLU
Return
Total return edge XLU +47.4% +294.7%
Annualized edge XLU +2.7% +9.8%
Price return edge XLU −12.6% +142.0%
Risk
Volatility edge BOND 4.9% 17.7%
Max drawdown edge BOND −19.5% −32.1%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge XLU 0.21 0.52
Sortino edge XLU 0.28 0.75
Calmar edge XLU 0.14 0.31
Reading

XLU returned more: +294.7% to +47.4%. BOND swung less: 4.9% to 17.7%. BOND fell less at its worst: −19.5% to −32.1%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: BOND vs XLU: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBONDXLUEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+47.4%+294.7%XLUPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+2.7%+9.8%XLUTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return−12.6%+142.0%XLUPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility4.9%17.7%BONDSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation3.6%12.2%BONDLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−19.5%−32.1%BONDDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.210.52XLUReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.280.75XLUReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar0.140.31XLUAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 763 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, BOND and XLU hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first BOND XLU
Only in one fund ↓
Only in BOND
UMBS, TBA 5.56%
PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund 4.07%
UMBS, TBA 3.46%
United States Treasury 3.40%
UMBS, TBA 2.73%
United States Treasury 2.57%
UMBS, TBA 2.54%
UMBS, TBA 2.27%
Only in XLU
NEXTERA ENERGY INC 12.76%
SOUTHERN CO 7.91%
DUKE ENERGY CORP 7.22%
CONSTELLATION ENERGY 6.33%
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER 5.26%
DOMINION ENERGY INC 4.26%
SEMPRA 4.12%
ENTERGY CORP 3.75%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

BOND PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of Utilities
Total return, 1 year −1.4% −3.0%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.4% (AGG) not measured
Gap to its benchmark 0.0 pts vs AGG not measured
Expense ratio 0.54% 0.08%
Holdings 1565 32
Net assets, BOND as of Jun 30, 2026 and XLU as of Oct 27, 2026 $8.3bn $23.9bn

BOND and XLU on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief

No client brief for this pair: the two funds' holdings are dated 119 days apart.

Alert

XLU flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BOND

BOND is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.54% a year. It sat 3.1% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

XLU

XLU tracks an index of Utilities. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −3.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 32 positions, with the top ten at 58.7%. It sat 9.1% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BOND or XLU?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BOND returned −1.4% and XLU −3.0%.
Which is cheaper, BOND or XLU?
XLU is cheaper, by 0.46 percentage points a year. That is about $46 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BOND against XLU, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bond-vs-xlu

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.