Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

BOND vs IWO: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BOND returned −1.4% to IWO's +7.9%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BOND and IWO

Net assets: $8.3bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund, and $14.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF.

At a glance
−1.4%
BOND total return, 1 year
+7.9%
IWO total return, 1 year
0.54%
BOND expense ratio
0.24%
IWO expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IWO costs 0.30 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 9.3 points.

BOND vs IWO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBONDIWO
Return
Total return, 1 year−1.4%+7.9%
Drawdown
Below its high3.1%, high on Feb 27, 20269.9%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedRussell 2000 Growth Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.54%0.24%
Net assets, BOND as of Jun 30, 2026 and IWO as of Oct 27, 2026$8.3bn$14.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund6.4%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, BOND and IWO hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first BOND IWO
Only in one fund ↓
Only in BOND
UMBS, TBA 5.56%
PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund 4.07%
UMBS, TBA 3.46%
United States Treasury 3.40%
UMBS, TBA 2.73%
United States Treasury 2.57%
UMBS, TBA 2.54%
UMBS, TBA 2.27%
Only in IWO
JFROG 0.74%
TWIST BIOSCIENCE 0.71%
GLAUKOS 0.70%
MOOG INC CLASS A 0.68%
BRIGHTSPRING HEALTH SERVICES INC 0.66%
10X GENOMICS CLASS A 0.61%
RYMAN HOSPITALITY PROPERTIES REIT 0.60%
INTERDIGITAL INC 0.58%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

BOND PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
Issuer PIMCO iShares
What it is Actively managed Tracks the Russell 2000 Growth
Total return, 1 year −1.4% +7.9%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.4% (AGG) +8.0% (VTWG)
Gap to its benchmark 0.0 pts vs AGG −0.1 pts vs VTWG
Expense ratio 0.54% 0.24%
Holdings 1565 1122
Net assets, BOND as of Jun 30, 2026 and IWO as of Oct 27, 2026 $8.3bn $14.0bn

BOND and IWO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

IWO flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BOND

BOND is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.54% a year. It sat 3.1% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

IWO

IWO tracks the Russell 2000 Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.9% with distributions reinvested, against +8.0% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,122 positions, with the top ten at 6.4%. It sat 9.9% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BOND or IWO?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BOND returned −1.4% and IWO +7.9%.
Which is cheaper, BOND or IWO?
IWO is cheaper, by 0.30 percentage points a year. That is about $30 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BOND against IWO, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bond-vs-iwo

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.