Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IWO vs VUSB: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWO returned +7.9% to VUSB's +3.5%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IWO and VUSB

Net assets: $14.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF, and $9.9bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF.

At a glance
+7.9%
IWO total return, 1 year
+3.5%
VUSB total return, 1 year
0.24%
IWO expense ratio
0.10%
VUSB expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VUSB costs 0.14 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.4 points; IWO is 1.4 times larger.

IWO vs VUSB: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIWOVUSB
Return
Total return, 1 year+7.9%+3.5%
Drawdown
Below its high9.9%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksRussell 2000 Growth IndexNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.24%0.10%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$14.1bn$9.9bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund6.4%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, IWO and VUSB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IWO VUSB
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IWO
JFROG 0.74%
TWIST BIOSCIENCE 0.71%
GLAUKOS 0.70%
MOOG INC CLASS A 0.68%
BRIGHTSPRING HEALTH SERVICES INC 0.66%
10X GENOMICS CLASS A 0.61%
RYMAN HOSPITALITY PROPERTIES REIT 0.60%
INTERDIGITAL INC 0.58%
Only in VUSB
United States Treasury Bill 2.39%
United States Treasury Bill 2.35%
MKTLIQ 2.00%
Regions Bank/Birmingham AL 0.89%
PNC Financial Services Group Inc 0.53%
National Bank of Canada 0.53%
Citizens Bank NA/Providence RI 0.48%
US Bancorp 0.47%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF VUSB Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks the Russell 2000 Growth Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +7.9% +3.5%
Its benchmark over the same days +8.0% (VTWG) −1.4% (AGG)
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs VTWG +4.9 pts vs AGG
Expense ratio 0.24% 0.10%
Holdings 1122 1344
Net assets, IWO as of Oct 27, 2026 and VUSB as of Sep 30, 2026 $14.0bn $9.9bn

IWO and VUSB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

IWO flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IWO

IWO tracks the Russell 2000 Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.9% with distributions reinvested, against +8.0% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,122 positions, with the top ten at 6.4%. It sat 9.9% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

VUSB

VUSB is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +3.5% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWO or VUSB?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWO returned +7.9% and VUSB +3.5%.
Which is cheaper, IWO or VUSB?
VUSB is cheaper, by 0.14 percentage points a year. That is about $14 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWO against VUSB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwo-vs-vusb

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.