Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IWO vs SHV: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWO returned +7.9% to SHV's +3.6%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IWO and SHV

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $14.0bn for iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF and $21.7bn for iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF.

At a glance
+7.9%
IWO total return, 1 year
+3.6%
SHV total return, 1 year
0.24%
IWO expense ratio
0.15%
SHV expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SHV costs 0.09 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.3 points; SHV is 1.6 times larger.

IWO vs SHV: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIWOSHV
Return
Total return, 1 year+7.9%+3.6%
Drawdown
Below its high9.9%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksRussell 2000 Growth IndexICE Short US Treasury Securities Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.24%0.15%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$14.0bn$21.7bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund6.4%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, IWO and SHV hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IWO SHV
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IWO
JFROG 0.74%
TWIST BIOSCIENCE 0.71%
GLAUKOS 0.70%
MOOG INC CLASS A 0.68%
BRIGHTSPRING HEALTH SERVICES INC 0.66%
10X GENOMICS CLASS A 0.61%
RYMAN HOSPITALITY PROPERTIES REIT 0.60%
INTERDIGITAL INC 0.58%
Only in SHV
TREASURY BILL 4.98%
TREASURY BILL 4.17%
TREASURY BILL 3.90%
TREASURY BILL 3.72%
TREASURY BILL 3.58%
TREASURY BILL 3.48%
TREASURY BILL 3.35%
TREASURY BILL 3.31%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF SHV iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks the Russell 2000 Growth Tracks an index of 0-1 Year Treasury Bond
Total return, 1 year +7.9% +3.6%
Its benchmark over the same days +8.0% (VTWG) not measured
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs VTWG not measured
Expense ratio 0.24% 0.15%
Holdings 1122 66
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $14.0bn $21.7bn

IWO and SHV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

IWO and SHV flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IWO

IWO tracks the Russell 2000 Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.9% with distributions reinvested, against +8.0% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,122 positions, with the top ten at 6.4%. It sat 9.9% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

SHV

SHV tracks an index of 0-1 Year Treasury Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +3.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWO or SHV?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWO returned +7.9% and SHV +3.6%.
Which is cheaper, IWO or SHV?
SHV is cheaper, by 0.09 percentage points a year. That is about $9 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWO against SHV, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwo-vs-shv

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.