Which returned more over the last year, IWO or VCLT?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWO returned +17.0% and VCLT returned −4.8%, so IWO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, IWO or VCLT?

IWO charges 0.24% a year and VCLT charges 0.03%, so VCLT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IWO vs VCLT: how they differ

IWO and VCLT hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and IWO returned more over the year.

iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF and Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IWO and VCLT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IWO	Only in VCLT
MOOG INC CLASS A 0.69%	Anheuser-Busch Cos LLC / Anheuser-Busch 0.38%
GLAUKOS 0.65%	CVS Health Corp 0.34%
JFROG 0.64%	Meta Platforms Inc 0.29%
BRIGHTSPRING HEALTH SERVICES INC 0.62%	Boeing Co/The 0.27%
FIRSTCASH HOLDINGS INC 0.62%	Pfizer Investment Enterprises Pte Ltd 0.27%
BRINKER INTERNATIONAL INC 0.61%	Amazon.com Inc 0.26%
INTERDIGITAL INC 0.60%	Oracle Corp 0.24%
KRYSTAL BIOTECH 0.59%	AT&T Inc 0.24%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.

IWO and VCLT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF	VCLT Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	Vanguard
What it is	Russell 2000 Growth	Long-Term Corporate Bond
Total return, 1 year	+17.0%	−4.8%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−0.5 pts	−22.3 pts
Expense ratio	0.24%	0.03%
Holdings	970	2775

IWO in plain words

IWO is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 2000 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 970 positions, with the top ten at 6.2%. It sat 7.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VCLT in plain words

VCLT is a bond fund tracking the Long-Term Corporate Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −4.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 18.1% below its high of Sep 22, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWO or VCLT?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWO returned +17.0% and VCLT returned −4.8%, so IWO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IWO or VCLT?: IWO charges 0.24% a year and VCLT charges 0.03%, so VCLT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IWO against VCLT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWO against VCLT, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwo-vs-vclt Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources