Which returned more over the last year, ACWX or VCLT?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWX returned +23.0% and VCLT returned −4.8%, so ACWX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, ACWX or VCLT?

ACWX charges 0.32% a year and VCLT charges 0.03%, so VCLT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ACWX vs VCLT: how they differ

ACWX and VCLT hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and ACWX returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF and Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACWX and VCLT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ACWX	Only in VCLT
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 5.09%	Anheuser-Busch Cos LLC / Anheuser-Busch 0.38%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 2.50%	CVS Health Corp 0.34%
SK HYNIX 2.04%	Meta Platforms Inc 0.29%
ASML HOLDING 1.77%	Boeing Co/The 0.27%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.94%	Pfizer Investment Enterprises Pte Ltd 0.27%
TENCENT HOLDINGS 0.88%	Amazon.com Inc 0.26%
ROCHE PS PAR AG 0.79%	Oracle Corp 0.24%
ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 0.76%	AT&T Inc 0.24%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.

ACWX and VCLT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	ACWX iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF	VCLT Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	Vanguard
What it is	MSCI ACWI ex U.S.	Long-Term Corporate Bond
Total return, 1 year	+23.0%	−4.8%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+5.5 pts	−22.3 pts
Expense ratio	0.32%	0.03%
Holdings	1515	2775

ACWX in plain words

ACWX is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI ACWI ex U.S.. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1515 positions, with the top ten at 16.1%.

VCLT in plain words

VCLT is a bond fund tracking the Long-Term Corporate Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −4.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 18.1% below its high of Sep 22, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ACWX or VCLT?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWX returned +23.0% and VCLT returned −4.8%, so ACWX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, ACWX or VCLT?: ACWX charges 0.32% a year and VCLT charges 0.03%, so VCLT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ACWX against VCLT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACWX against VCLT, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwx-vs-vclt Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources