Which returned more over the last year, ACWX or BOND?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWX returned +23.0% and BOND returned −0.1%, so ACWX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, ACWX or BOND?

ACWX charges 0.32% a year and BOND charges 0.54%, so ACWX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ACWX vs BOND: how they differ

ACWX and BOND hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and ACWX returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF and PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACWX and BOND hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ACWX	Only in BOND
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 5.09%	UMBS, TBA 4.80%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 2.50%	PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active 3.52%
SK HYNIX 2.04%	UMBS, TBA 2.98%
ASML HOLDING 1.77%	United States Treasury 2.93%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.94%	UMBS, TBA 2.36%
TENCENT HOLDINGS 0.88%	United States Treasury 2.22%
ROCHE PS PAR AG 0.79%	UMBS, TBA 2.19%
ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 0.76%	UMBS, TBA 1.96%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.

ACWX and BOND on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	ACWX iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF	BOND PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	PIMCO
What it is	MSCI ACWI ex U.S.	Active Bond Exchange-Traded
Total return, 1 year	+23.0%	−0.1%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+5.5 pts	−17.6 pts
Expense ratio	0.32%	0.54%
Holdings	1515	1565

ACWX in plain words

ACWX is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI ACWI ex U.S.. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1515 positions, with the top ten at 16.1%.

BOND in plain words

BOND is a bond fund tracking the Active Bond Exchange-Traded. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.54% a year. It sat 3.3% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ACWX or BOND?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWX returned +23.0% and BOND returned −0.1%, so ACWX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, ACWX or BOND?: ACWX charges 0.32% a year and BOND charges 0.54%, so ACWX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ACWX against BOND, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACWX against BOND, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwx-vs-bond Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources