Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ACWX vs AVDV: how they differ

ACWX and AVDV hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and AVDV returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACWX and AVDV hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions ACWX and AVDV both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingACWXAVDV
HERMES INTERNATIONAL0.15%0.33%
ORANGE SA0.09%0.09%
PRUDENTIAL PLC0.09%0.63%
AIRBUS GROUP0.36%0.08%
NEC0.10%0.05%
PHOENIX FINANCIAL LTD0.04%0.09%
AGNICO EAGLE MINES0.26%0.04%
ASR NEDERLAND0.03%0.05%
BANKINTER SA0.03%0.15%
ENLIGHT RENEWABLE ENERGY0.03%0.29%
THOMSON REUTERS CORP0.03%0.10%
UNIPOL ASSICURAZIONI SPA0.03%0.14%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ACWXOnly in AVDV
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 5.09%AT&S Austria Technologie & Systemtechnik 1.72%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 2.50%Mitsui Kinzoku Co Ltd 1.38%
SK HYNIX 2.04%Clal Insurance Enterprises Holdings Ltd 0.74%
ASML HOLDING 1.77%Hudbay Minerals Inc 0.67%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.94%OceanaGold Corp 0.63%
TENCENT HOLDINGS 0.88%Coeur Mining Inc 0.61%
ROCHE PS PAR AG 0.79%Whitehaven Coal Ltd 0.61%
ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 0.76%B2Gold Corp 0.59%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.

ACWX and AVDV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACWX
iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF
AVDV
Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesAvantis
What it isMSCI ACWI ex U.S.International Small Cap Value
Total return, 1 year+23.0%+31.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+5.5 pts+13.5 pts
Expense ratio0.32%0.36%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%0.0%
Holdings15151751

ACWX in plain words

ACWX is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI ACWI ex U.S.. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1515 positions, with the top ten at 16.1%.

AVDV in plain words

AVDV is an index equity fund tracking the International Small Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +31.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1751 positions, with the top ten at 8.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ACWX or AVDV?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWX returned +23.0% and AVDV returned +31.0%, so AVDV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, ACWX or AVDV?
ACWX charges 0.32% a year and AVDV charges 0.36%, so ACWX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ACWX and AVDV overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of ACWX and 0% of AVDV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ACWX against AVDV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACWX against AVDV, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwx-vs-avdv Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources