Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

BNDX vs CGBL: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BNDX returned −0.9% to CGBL's +7.1%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BNDX and CGBL

Net assets: $82.9bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Total International Bond ETF, and $7.9bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Capital Group Core Balanced ETF.

At a glance
−0.9%
BNDX total return, 1 year
+7.1%
CGBL total return, 1 year
0.07%
BNDX expense ratio
0.33%
CGBL expense ratio

Pair scorecard

BNDX costs 0.26 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.0 points; BNDX is 10.8 times larger.

BNDX vs CGBL: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBNDXCGBL
Return
Total return, 1 year−0.9%+7.1%
Drawdown
Below its high3.4%, high on Aug 13, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksBloomberg Global Aggregate ex-USD Float Adjusted RIC Capped Index (USD Hedged)No index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.07%0.33%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$82.9bn$7.7bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight48%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund59.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, BNDX and CGBL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first BNDX CGBL
Only in one fund ↓
Only in BNDX
MKTLIQ 0.93%
United Kingdom Gilt 0.39%
French Republic Government Bond OAT 0.35%
United Kingdom Gilt 0.35%
French Republic Government Bond OAT 0.35%
United Kingdom Gilt 0.34%
United Kingdom Gilt 0.33%
French Republic Government Bond OAT 0.31%
Only in CGBL
Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF 23.27%
Capital Group Core Bond ETF 15.64%
Broadcom Inc 4.58%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd 3.49%
Alphabet Inc 2.79%
Micron Technology Inc 2.23%
Philip Morris International Inc 2.07%
Apple Inc 2.01%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

BNDX Vanguard Total International Bond ETF CGBL Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Allocation ETF
What it is Tracks an index of Total International Bond Actively managed
Total return, 1 year −0.9% +7.1%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +7.5% (VOO and AGG)
Gap to its benchmark not measured −0.4 pts vs VOO and AGG
Expense ratio 0.07% 0.33%
Holdings 6840 77
Net assets, BNDX as of Sep 30, 2026 and CGBL as of Oct 27, 2026 $82.9bn $7.9bn

BNDX and CGBL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BNDX

BNDX tracks an index of Total International Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.9% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year.

CGBL

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.1% with distributions reinvested, against +7.5% for its benchmark, the 60%/40% S&P 500 Index/Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index.

CGBL is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 48% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 77 positions, with the top ten at 59.3%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BNDX or CGBL?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BNDX returned −0.9% and CGBL +7.1%.
Which is cheaper, BNDX or CGBL?
BNDX is cheaper, by 0.26 percentage points a year. That is about $26 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BNDX against CGBL, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bndx-vs-cgbl

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.