Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

CGBL vs IEF: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGBL returned +7.1% to IEF's −3.2%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about CGBL and IEF

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $7.9bn for Capital Group Core Balanced ETF and $43.5bn for iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF.

At a glance
+7.1%
CGBL total return, 1 year
−3.2%
IEF total return, 1 year
0.33%
CGBL expense ratio
0.15%
IEF expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IEF costs 0.18 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.3 points; IEF is 5.5 times larger.

CGBL vs IEF: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCGBLIEF
Return
Total return, 1 year+7.1%−3.2%
Drawdown
Below its high3.4%, high on Aug 13, 202613.1%, high on Aug 4, 2020
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedICE U.S. Treasury 7-10 Year Bond Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.33%0.15%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$7.9bn$43.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight48%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund59.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Oct 6, 2023 to Oct 23, 2026 · 159 weekly returns
CGBL IEF
Return
Total return edge CGBL +55.6% +13.0%
Annualized edge CGBL +15.6% +4.1%
Price return edge CGBL +46.8% +1.1%
Risk
Volatility edge IEF 10.4% 6.4%
Max drawdown edge IEF −10.0% −6.7%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge CGBL 1.02 −0.04
Sortino edge CGBL 1.58 −0.06
Calmar edge CGBL 1.55 0.61
Reading

CGBL returned more: +55.6% to +13.0%. IEF swung less: 6.4% to 10.4%. IEF fell less at its worst: −6.7% to −10.0%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: CGBL vs IEF: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCGBLIEFEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+55.6%+13.0%CGBLPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+15.6%+4.1%CGBLTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+46.8%+1.1%CGBLPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility10.4%6.4%IEFSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation6.7%4.5%IEFLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−10.0%−6.7%IEFDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe1.02−0.04CGBLReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.58−0.06CGBLReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar1.550.61CGBLAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 159 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, CGBL and IEF hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first CGBL IEF
Only in one fund ↓
Only in CGBL
Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF 23.27%
Capital Group Core Bond ETF 15.64%
Broadcom Inc 4.58%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd 3.49%
Alphabet Inc 2.79%
Micron Technology Inc 2.23%
Philip Morris International Inc 2.07%
Apple Inc 2.01%
Only in IEF
TREASURY NOTE 8.82%
TREASURY NOTE 8.80%
TREASURY NOTE 8.74%
TREASURY NOTE 8.68%
TREASURY NOTE (OLD) 8.68%
TREASURY NOTE (2OLD) 8.65%
TREASURY NOTE 8.48%
TREASURY NOTE 8.40%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

CGBL Capital Group Core Balanced ETF IEF iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF
Where it sits Allocation ETF Bond ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of 7-10 Year Treasury Bond
Total return, 1 year +7.1% −3.2%
Its benchmark over the same days +7.5% (VOO and AGG) not measured
Gap to its benchmark −0.4 pts vs VOO and AGG not measured
Expense ratio 0.33% 0.15%
Holdings 77 17
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $7.9bn $43.5bn

CGBL and IEF on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief

No client brief for this pair: the two funds' holdings are dated 119 days apart.

Alert

IEF flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
CGBL

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.1% with distributions reinvested, against +7.5% for its benchmark, the 60%/40% S&P 500 Index/Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index.

CGBL is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 48% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 77 positions, with the top ten at 59.3%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

IEF

IEF tracks an index of 7-10 Year Treasury Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −3.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. It sat 13.1% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGBL or IEF?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGBL returned +7.1% and IEF −3.2%.
Which is cheaper, CGBL or IEF?
IEF is cheaper, by 0.18 percentage points a year. That is about $18 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CGBL against IEF, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgbl-vs-ief

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.