Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
BSV vs CGBL: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BSV returned +1.0% to CGBL's +7.1%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about BSV and CGBL
Net assets: $45.4bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Short-Term Bond ETF, and $7.9bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Capital Group Core Balanced ETF.
Pair scorecard
BSV costs 0.30 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.1 points; BSV is 5.9 times larger.
| Measure | BSV | CGBL |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +1.0% | +7.1% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.4%, high on Aug 13, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Bloomberg U.S. 1-5 Year Government/Credit Float Adjusted Index | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.33% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $45.4bn | $7.7bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 48% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 59.3% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, BSV and CGBL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
BSV and CGBL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BSV
BSV tracks an index of Short-Term Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +1.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.1% with distributions reinvested, against +7.5% for its benchmark, the 60%/40% S&P 500 Index/Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index.
CGBL is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 48% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 77 positions, with the top ten at 59.3%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BSV or CGBL?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSV returned +1.0% and CGBL +7.1%.
- Which is cheaper, BSV or CGBL?
- BSV is cheaper, by 0.30 percentage points a year. That is about $30 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BSV against CGBL, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bsv-vs-cgbl
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). BSV against CGBL. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bsv-vs-cgbl
[BSV against CGBL (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bsv-vs-cgbl)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.