Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
AOR vs BSV: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, AOR returned +7.8% to BSV's +1.0%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about AOR and BSV
Net assets: $3.9bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF, and $45.4bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Short-Term Bond ETF.
Pair scorecard
BSV costs 0.12 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.8 points; BSV is 11.6 times larger.
| Measure | AOR | BSV |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +7.8% | +1.0% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | 60/40 Balanced Allocation | Bloomberg U.S. 1-5 Year Government/Credit Float Adjusted Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.03% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $3.9bn | $45.4bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 99.9% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, AOR and BSV hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
AOR and BSV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AOR
AOR tracks an index of 60/40 Balanced Allocation. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI All Country World Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 7 positions, with the top ten at 99.9%.
BSV
BSV tracks an index of Short-Term Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +1.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, AOR or BSV?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AOR returned +7.8% and BSV +1.0%.
- Which is cheaper, AOR or BSV?
- BSV is cheaper, by 0.12 percentage points a year. That is about $12 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, AOR against BSV, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/aor-vs-bsv
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). AOR against BSV. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/aor-vs-bsv
[AOR against BSV (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/aor-vs-bsv)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.