Which returned more over the last year, BSV or PDBC?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSV returned +1.1% and PDBC returned +55.2%, so PDBC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, BSV or PDBC?

BSV charges 0.03% a year and PDBC charges 0.59%, so BSV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BSV vs PDBC: how they differ

BSV and PDBC hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and PDBC returned more over the year.

Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BSV and PDBC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in BSV	Only in PDBC
United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.13%	Invesco Premier US Government Money Port 75.58%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.90%	POWERSHARES CAYMAN FUND 24.42%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.89%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.82%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.81%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.81%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.80%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.78%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.

BSV and PDBC on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	BSV Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund	PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Vanguard	Invesco
What it is	Short-Term Bond	Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy
Total return, 1 year	+1.1%	+55.2%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−16.4 pts	+37.7 pts
Expense ratio	0.03%	0.59%
Holdings	3185	2

BSV in plain words

BSV is a bond fund tracking the Short-Term Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +1.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.

PDBC in plain words

PDBC is an index equity fund tracking the Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +55.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BSV or PDBC?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSV returned +1.1% and PDBC returned +55.2%, so PDBC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, BSV or PDBC?: BSV charges 0.03% a year and PDBC charges 0.59%, so BSV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BSV against PDBC, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BSV against PDBC, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bsv-vs-pdbc Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources