Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

BSV vs PDBC: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BSV returned +1.0% to PDBC's +55.6%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BSV and PDBC

Net assets: $45.4bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Short-Term Bond ETF, and $8.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF.

At a glance
+1.0%
BSV total return, 1 year
+55.6%
PDBC total return, 1 year
0.03%
BSV expense ratio
0.59%
PDBC expense ratio

Pair scorecard

BSV costs 0.56 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 54.6 points.

BSV vs PDBC: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBSVPDBC
Return
Total return, 1 year+1.0%+55.6%
Benchmark
What it tracksBloomberg U.S. 1-5 Year Government/Credit Float Adjusted IndexNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.03%0.59%
Net assets, BSV as of Sep 30, 2026 and PDBC as of Oct 27, 2026$45.4bn$8.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, BSV and PDBC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first BSV PDBC
Only in one fund ↓
Only in BSV
United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.70%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.32%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.09%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.86%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.86%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.83%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.83%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.78%
Only in PDBC
POWERSHARES CAYMAN FUND 19.37%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

BSV Vanguard Short-Term Bond ETF PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Commodity ETF
What it is Tracks an index of Short-Term Bond Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +1.0% +55.6%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +54.6% (DBC)
Gap to its benchmark not measured +1.0 pts vs DBC
Expense ratio 0.03% 0.59%
Holdings 3157 1
Net assets, BSV as of Sep 30, 2026 and PDBC as of Oct 27, 2026 $45.4bn $8.0bn

BSV and PDBC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

PDBC flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BSV

BSV tracks an index of Short-Term Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +1.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.

PDBC

PDBC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +55.6% with distributions reinvested, against +54.6% for its benchmark, the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BSV or PDBC?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSV returned +1.0% and PDBC +55.6%.
Which is cheaper, BSV or PDBC?
BSV is cheaper, by 0.56 percentage points a year. That is about $56 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BSV against PDBC, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bsv-vs-pdbc

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.