Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

BND vs FBCG: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BND returned −1.3% to FBCG's +9.5%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BND and FBCG

Net assets on Sep 30, 2026: $161.4bn for Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF and $7.6bn for Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF.

At a glance
−1.3%
BND total return, 1 year
+9.5%
FBCG total return, 1 year
0.03%
BND expense ratio
0.57%
FBCG expense ratio

Pair scorecard

BND costs 0.54 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.8 points; BND is far larger, $161.4bn against $7.6bn.

BND vs FBCG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBNDFBCG
Return
Total return, 1 year−1.3%+9.5%
Drawdown
Below its high3.5%, high on Aug 6, 20205.7%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksBloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted IndexNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.03%0.57%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$161.4bn$7.6bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight85%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund57.2%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, BND and FBCG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first BND FBCG
Only in one fund ↓
Only in BND
MKTLIQ 0.92%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.41%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.41%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.41%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.41%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.41%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.40%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.39%
Only in FBCG
NVIDIA CORP 14.90%
APPLE INC 9.31%
ALPHABET INC 9.27%
AMAZON.COM INC 5.86%
MICROSOFT CORP 4.94%
BROADCOM INC 4.38%
ELI LILLY and CO 2.71%
META PLATFORMS INC 2.31%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of US aggregate bonds Actively managed
Total return, 1 year −1.3% +9.5%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.4% (AGG) +13.7% (VOO)
Gap to its benchmark +0.1 pts vs AGG −4.2 pts vs VOO
Expense ratio 0.03% 0.57%
Holdings 16301 230
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 $161.4bn $7.6bn

BND and FBCG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BND

BND tracks an index of US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.3% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index, measured by the closely related Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.5% below its high of Aug 6, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.

FBCG

FBCG is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +9.5% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 230 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BND or FBCG?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BND returned −1.3% and FBCG +9.5%.
Which is cheaper, BND or FBCG?
BND is cheaper, by 0.54 percentage points a year. That is about $54 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BND against FBCG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bnd-vs-fbcg

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.