Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
BSV vs FBCG: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BSV returned +1.0% to FBCG's +9.5%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about BSV and FBCG
Net assets on Sep 30, 2026: $45.4bn for Vanguard Short-Term Bond ETF and $7.6bn for Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF.
Pair scorecard
BSV costs 0.54 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.5 points; BSV is 6.0 times larger.
| Measure | BSV | FBCG |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +1.0% | +9.5% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 5.7%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Bloomberg U.S. 1-5 Year Government/Credit Float Adjusted Index | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.57% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $45.4bn | $7.6bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 85% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 57.2% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, BSV and FBCG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
BSV and FBCG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BSV
BSV tracks an index of Short-Term Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +1.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.
FBCG
FBCG is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +9.5% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 230 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BSV or FBCG?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSV returned +1.0% and FBCG +9.5%.
- Which is cheaper, BSV or FBCG?
- BSV is cheaper, by 0.54 percentage points a year. That is about $54 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BSV against FBCG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bsv-vs-fbcg
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). BSV against FBCG. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bsv-vs-fbcg
[BSV against FBCG (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bsv-vs-fbcg)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.