Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
BSV vs ONEQ: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BSV returned +1.0% to ONEQ's +12.7%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about BSV and ONEQ
Net assets on Sep 30, 2026: $45.4bn for Vanguard Short-Term Bond ETF and $10.9bn for Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF.
Pair scorecard
BSV costs 0.18 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 11.7 points; BSV is 4.2 times larger.
| Measure | BSV | ONEQ |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +1.0% | +12.7% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Bloomberg U.S. 1-5 Year Government/Credit Float Adjusted Index | Nasdaq Composite Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.21% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $45.4bn | $10.9bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 85% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 56.0% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, BSV and ONEQ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
BSV and ONEQ on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BSV
BSV tracks an index of Short-Term Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +1.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.
ONEQ
ONEQ tracks the Nasdaq Composite. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +12.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,026 positions, with the top ten at 56.0%. It sat 3.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BSV or ONEQ?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSV returned +1.0% and ONEQ +12.7%.
- Which is cheaper, BSV or ONEQ?
- BSV is cheaper, by 0.18 percentage points a year. That is about $18 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BSV against ONEQ, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bsv-vs-oneq
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). BSV against ONEQ. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bsv-vs-oneq
[BSV against ONEQ (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bsv-vs-oneq)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.