Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
MBB vs ONEQ: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MBB returned −0.8% to ONEQ's +12.7%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about MBB and ONEQ
Net assets: $35.5bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MBS ETF, and $10.9bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF.
Pair scorecard
MBB costs 0.17 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 13.5 points; MBB is 3.3 times larger.
| Measure | MBB | ONEQ |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −0.8% | +12.7% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Bloomberg U.S. MBS Index | Nasdaq Composite Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.04% | 0.21% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $36.2bn | $10.9bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 85% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 56.0% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, MBB and ONEQ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
MBB and ONEQ on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MBB
MBB tracks an index of mortgage-backed securities. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.8% with distributions reinvested, against −1.1% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. MBS Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year.
ONEQ
ONEQ tracks the Nasdaq Composite. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +12.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,026 positions, with the top ten at 56.0%. It sat 3.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, MBB or ONEQ?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MBB returned −0.8% and ONEQ +12.7%.
- Which is cheaper, MBB or ONEQ?
- MBB is cheaper, by 0.17 percentage points a year. That is about $17 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, MBB against ONEQ, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mbb-vs-oneq
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). MBB against ONEQ. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mbb-vs-oneq
[MBB against ONEQ (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mbb-vs-oneq)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.