Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
BIL vs ONEQ: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BIL returned +3.7% to ONEQ's +12.7%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about BIL and ONEQ
Net assets: $48.7bn on Oct 27, 2026 for SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF, and $10.9bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF.
Pair scorecard
BIL costs 0.07 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 9.0 points; BIL is 4.6 times larger.
| Measure | BIL | ONEQ |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +3.7% | +12.7% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index | Nasdaq Composite Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.14% | 0.21% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $49.8bn | $10.9bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 85% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 56.0% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, BIL and ONEQ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
BIL and ONEQ on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BIL
BIL tracks an index of 1-3 month T-bills. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +3.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year.
ONEQ
ONEQ tracks the Nasdaq Composite. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +12.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,026 positions, with the top ten at 56.0%. It sat 3.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BIL or ONEQ?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BIL returned +3.7% and ONEQ +12.7%.
- Which is cheaper, BIL or ONEQ?
- BIL is cheaper, by 0.07 percentage points a year. That is about $7 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BIL against ONEQ, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bil-vs-oneq
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). BIL against ONEQ. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bil-vs-oneq
[BIL against ONEQ (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bil-vs-oneq)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.