Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
MINT vs ONEQ: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MINT returned +4.2% to ONEQ's +12.7%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about MINT and ONEQ
Net assets: $16.4bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund, and $10.9bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF.
Pair scorecard
ONEQ costs 0.15 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.5 points.
| Measure | MINT | ONEQ |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +4.2% | +12.7% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | Nasdaq Composite Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.36% | 0.21% |
| Net assets, MINT as of Jun 30, 2026 and ONEQ as of Sep 30, 2026 | $16.4bn | $10.9bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 85% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 56.0% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, MINT and ONEQ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
MINT and ONEQ on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MINT
MINT is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year.
ONEQ
ONEQ tracks the Nasdaq Composite. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +12.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,026 positions, with the top ten at 56.0%. It sat 3.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, MINT or ONEQ?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MINT returned +4.2% and ONEQ +12.7%.
- Which is cheaper, MINT or ONEQ?
- ONEQ is cheaper, by 0.15 percentage points a year. That is about $15 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, MINT against ONEQ, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mint-vs-oneq
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). MINT against ONEQ. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mint-vs-oneq
[MINT against ONEQ (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mint-vs-oneq)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.