Which returned more over the last year, BND or BWET?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BND returned −0.7% and BWET returned +5129.6%, so BWET returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, BND or BWET?

BND charges 0.03% a year and BWET charges 0.15%, so BND is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BND vs BWET: how they differ

BND is a bond index fund and BWET a commodity fund, and over the year BWET returned more, +5129.6% against −0.7%.

Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF.

BND and BWET on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	BND Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund	BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Vanguard	Breakwave
What it is	US aggregate bonds	Tanker Shipping
Total return, 1 year	−0.7%	+5129.6%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−18.2 pts	+5112.1 pts
Expense ratio	0.03%	0.15%

BND in plain words

BND is a bond fund tracking the US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.8% below its high of Aug 6, 2020 on Sep 11, 2026.

BWET in plain words

BWET is a commodity fund tracking the Tanker Shipping. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +5129.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BND or BWET?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BND returned −0.7% and BWET returned +5129.6%, so BWET returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, BND or BWET?: BND charges 0.03% a year and BWET charges 0.15%, so BND is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BND against BWET, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BND against BWET, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bnd-vs-bwet Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources