Which returned more over the last year, AGG or BWET?

In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AGG returned −1.4% and BWET +5,121.7%.

Which is cheaper, AGG or BWET?

AGG is cheaper, by 4.65 percentage points a year. That is about $465 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

Across categories

AGG vs BWET: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share on X Download as PDF

AGG is a bond index fund and BWET a commodity futures fund, and over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BWET returned +5,121.7% against −1.4%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about AGG and BWET

Net assets: $139.4bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF, and $178m on Oct 28, 2026 for Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF.

AGG on its own →BWET on its own →

At a glance

−1.4%

AGG total return, 1 year

+5,121.7%

BWET total return, 1 year

0.03%

AGG expense ratio

4.68%

BWET expense ratio

Pair scorecard

AGG costs 4.65 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5123.1 points; AGG is far larger, $139.3bn against $186m.

AGG vs BWET: Differences, Returns & Fees
Measure	AGG	BWET
Return
Measure	AGG	BWET
Total return, 1 year	−1.4%	+5,121.7%
Drawdown
Measure	AGG	BWET
Below its high	3.4%, high on Aug 4, 2020	11.2%, high on Oct 8, 2026
Benchmark
Measure	AGG	BWET
What it tracks	Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index	Tanker freight futures
Cost and size
Measure	AGG	BWET
Expense ratio	0.03%	4.68%
Net assets, as of Oct 26, 2026	$139.3bn	$186m
Holdings
Measure	AGG	BWET
Holdings in common	not published

Method

Side by side

AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF

Where it sits Bond ETF Commodity ETF

Issuer iShares Breakwave

What it is Tracks an index of US aggregate bonds Holds tanker freight futures

Total return, 1 year −1.4% +5,121.7%

Its benchmark over the same days −1.3% (SCHZ) not measured

Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs SCHZ not measured

Expense ratio 0.03% 4.68%

Holdings 13469 not counted

Net assets, AGG as of Oct 27, 2026 and BWET as of Oct 28, 2026 $139.4bn $178m

AGG and BWET on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

About each fund

AGG

AGG tracks an index of US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.3% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.4% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.

BWET

Its expense ratio is 4.68%, for the year to Jun 30, 2026, as its 10-K states.

BWET holds tanker freight futures. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +5,121.7% with distributions reinvested. It sat 11.2% below its high of Oct 8, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AGG or BWET?: In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AGG returned −1.4% and BWET +5,121.7%.
Which is cheaper, AGG or BWET?: AGG is cheaper, by 4.65 percentage points a year. That is about $465 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.

Other comparisons

AGG vs USO AGG vs SIVR AGG vs SLV AGG vs GLDM BND vs BWET BWET vs SGOV BNDX vs BWET BWET vs VCIT

Where to next

AGG on its own →BWET on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →AGG dividend history →AGG holdings →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

AGG filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

AGG prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

iShares page for AGG ↗

Breakwave page for BWET ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, AGG against BWET, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/agg-vs-bwet

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.