Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
BLCR vs CGGR: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BLCR returned +18.8% to CGGR's +2.6%; 33% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about BLCR and CGGR
Net assets: $9.8bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares Large Cap Core Active ETF, and $25.9bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Capital Group Growth ETF.
Pair scorecard
BLCR costs 0.03 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 16.2 points; CGGR is 2.6 times larger.
| Measure | BLCR | CGGR |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +18.8% | +2.6% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.1%, high on May 29, 2026 | 3.4%, high on Oct 6, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.36% | 0.39% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $9.8bn | $25.9bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 33% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 48.3% | 39.7% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, BLCR and CGGR hold 33% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
33% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
BLCR and CGGR on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BLCR and CGGR are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- Holdings in common. 33% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 BLCR returned +18.8% and CGGR +2.6% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 16.2 points.
- What each follows (similar). Both follow No index, actively managed.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index.
BLCR is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 51 positions, with the top ten at 48.3%. It sat 3.1% below its high of May 29, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
CGGR
CGGR is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.6% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 78% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 39.7%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BLCR or CGGR?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BLCR returned +18.8% and CGGR +2.6%.
- Which is cheaper, BLCR or CGGR?
- BLCR is cheaper, by 0.03 percentage points a year. That is about $3 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BLCR against CGGR, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/blcr-vs-cggr
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). BLCR against CGGR. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/blcr-vs-cggr
[BLCR against CGGR (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/blcr-vs-cggr)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.