Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
BKDV vs CGDV: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BKDV returned +24.9% to CGDV's +15.8%; 19% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about BKDV and CGDV
Net assets: $1.8bn on Jul 31, 2026 for BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF, and $39.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Capital Group Dividend Value ETF.
Pair scorecard
CGDV costs 0.27 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 9.1 points.
| Measure | BKDV | CGDV |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +24.9% | +15.8% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.6%, high on Aug 13, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.60% | 0.33% |
| Net assets, BKDV as of Jul 31, 2026 and CGDV as of Oct 27, 2026 | $1.8bn | $39.1bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 19% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 33.3% | 42.0% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, BKDV and CGDV hold 19% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.
half
19% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
BKDV and CGDV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BKDV and CGDV are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- Holdings in common. 19% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 BKDV returned +24.9% and CGDV +15.8% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 9.1 points.
- Cost. BKDV charges 0.60% of assets a year and CGDV 0.33%, a gap of 0.27 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.9% with distributions reinvested, against +27.5% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index.
BKDV is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.60% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 80 positions, with the top ten at 33.3%.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.8% with distributions reinvested, against +27.5% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index.
CGDV is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 42.0%. It sat 3.6% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BKDV or CGDV?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BKDV returned +24.9% and CGDV +15.8%.
- Which is cheaper, BKDV or CGDV?
- CGDV is cheaper, by 0.27 percentage points a year. That is about $27 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BKDV against CGDV, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bkdv-vs-cgdv
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). BKDV against CGDV. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bkdv-vs-cgdv
[BKDV against CGDV (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bkdv-vs-cgdv)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.