BKDV vs DGRO: Differences, Returns & Fees
BKDV and DGRO hold 28% of their weight in the same names, and BKDV returned +23.4% over the year. Net assets: $1.8bn on Jul 31, 2026 for BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF, and $43.1bn on Oct 9, 2026 for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF.
DGRO costs 0.52 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.6 points; DGRO is far larger, $42.8bn against $1.8bn.
| BKDV | DGRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.60% | 0.08% |
| Net assets, as of Jul 31, 2026 | $1.8bn | $42.8bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +23.4% | +15.8% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index |
| Holdings in common | 28% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 33.3% | 27.4% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, BKDV and DGRO hold 28% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
half
28% in common
On the same fields
BKDV and DGRO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About BKDV
BKDV is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.60% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 80 positions, with the top ten at 33.3%.
Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +23.4% with distributions reinvested, against +26.4% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index.
About DGRO
DGRO tracks an index of Dividend Growth. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +15.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 393 positions, with the top ten at 27.4%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BKDV or DGRO?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BKDV returned +23.4% and DGRO +15.8%.
- Which is cheaper, BKDV or DGRO?
- DGRO is cheaper, by 0.52 percentage points a year. That is about $52 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BKDV against DGRO, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bkdv-vs-dgro
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). BKDV against DGRO. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bkdv-vs-dgro
[BKDV against DGRO (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bkdv-vs-dgro)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.