Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
CGDV vs FNDB: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGDV returned +15.8% to FNDB's +23.2%; 24% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CGDV and FNDB
Net assets: $39.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Capital Group Dividend Value ETF, and $1.5bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market ETF.
Pair scorecard
FNDB costs 0.08 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.4 points.
| Measure | CGDV | FNDB |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +15.8% | +23.2% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.6%, high on Aug 13, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | not read by ETFIQ |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.33% | 0.25% |
| Net assets, CGDV as of Oct 27, 2026 and FNDB as of Aug 31, 2026 | $39.1bn | $1.5bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 24% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 42.0% | 19.5% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, CGDV and FNDB hold 24% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026.
half
24% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
CGDV and FNDB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGDV and FNDB are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- Holdings in common. 24% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 CGDV returned +15.8% and FNDB +23.2% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 7.4 points.
- Number of holdings. CGDV holds 53 positions and FNDB holds 1621.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.8% with distributions reinvested, against +27.5% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index.
CGDV is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 42.0%. It sat 3.6% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +23.2% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.
FNDB tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 83% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,621 positions, with the top ten at 19.5%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGDV or FNDB?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGDV returned +15.8% and FNDB +23.2%.
- Which is cheaper, CGDV or FNDB?
- FNDB is cheaper, by 0.08 percentage points a year. That is about $8 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGDV against FNDB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgdv-vs-fndb
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). CGDV against FNDB. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgdv-vs-fndb
[CGDV against FNDB (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgdv-vs-fndb)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.