Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
BINC vs PULS: Differences, Returns & Fees
BINC's duration was 2.9 years on Jul 31, 2026 and PULS's 0.7 on May 29, 2026; PULS charges 0.15% to BINC's 0.40%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about BINC and PULSNet assets on Oct 27, 2026: $16.8bn for iShares Flexible Income Active ETF and $19.8bn for PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF.
Pair scorecard
PULS costs 0.25 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.5 points; PULS is 1.2 times larger.
| Measure | BINC | PULS |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +0.5% | +4.0% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.40% | 0.15% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $16.8bn | $19.8bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 24.6% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Jun 2, 2023 to Oct 23, 2026 · 177 weekly returnsBINC returned slightly more: +21.3% to +19.4%. PULS swung less: 0.4% to 3.1%. PULS fell less at its worst: −0.2% to −2.7%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | BINC | PULS | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +21.3% | +19.4% | BINC (slight) | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +5.8% | +5.4% | BINC (slight) | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +0.2% | +0.9% | PULS | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 3.1% | 0.4% | PULS | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 2.0% | 0.3% | PULS | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −2.7% | −0.2% | PULS | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.37 | 1.62 | PULS | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.57 | 2.52 | PULS | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 2.20 | 22.11 | PULS | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 177 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, BINC and PULS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
BINC and PULS on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BINC and PULS do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and May 29, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 BINC returned +0.5% and PULS +4.0% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 3.5 points.
- Number of holdings. BINC holds 4,690 positions and PULS holds 553.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
BINC
BINC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +0.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.40% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 4,690 positions, with the top ten at 24.6%.
PULS
PULS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BINC or PULS?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BINC returned +0.5% and PULS +4.0%.
- Which is cheaper, BINC or PULS?
- PULS is cheaper, by 0.25 percentage points a year. That is about $25 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BINC against PULS, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/binc-vs-puls
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). BINC against PULS. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/binc-vs-puls
[BINC against PULS (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/binc-vs-puls)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.