Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

PULS vs SCHP: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

PULS's duration was 0.7 years on May 29, 2026 and SCHP's 6.3 on Jun 30, 2026; SCHP charges 0.03% to PULS's 0.15%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about PULS and SCHP

Net assets: $19.8bn on Oct 27, 2026 for PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF, and $16.5bn on Jun 30, 2026 for Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF.

At a glance
+4.0%
PULS total return, 1 year
−0.8%
SCHP total return, 1 year
0.15%
PULS expense ratio
0.03%
SCHP expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SCHP costs 0.12 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.8 points.

PULS vs SCHP: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasurePULSSCHP
Return
Total return, 1 year+4.0%−0.8%
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedUS TIPS
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.15%0.03%
Net assets, PULS as of Oct 27, 2026 and SCHP as of Jun 30, 2026$19.8bn$16.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Apr 20, 2018 to Oct 23, 2026 · 444 weekly returns
PULS SCHP
Return
Total return edge PULS +32.2% +26.2%
Annualized edge PULS +3.3% +2.8%
Price return edge PULS −0.9% −6.1%
Risk
Volatility edge PULS 1.9% 5.7%
Max drawdown edge PULS −5.9% −14.0%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge PULS 0.27 0.02
Sortino edge PULS 0.32 0.03
Calmar edge PULS 0.57 0.20
Reading

PULS returned more: +32.2% to +26.2%. PULS swung less: 1.9% to 5.7%. PULS fell less at its worst: −5.9% to −14.0%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: PULS vs SCHP: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasurePULSSCHPEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+32.2%+26.2%PULSPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+3.3%+2.8%PULSTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return−0.9%−6.1%PULSPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility1.9%5.7%PULSSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation1.6%4.4%PULSLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−5.9%−14.0%PULSDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.270.02PULSReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.320.03PULSReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar0.570.20PULSAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 444 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, PULS and SCHP hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first PULS SCHP
Only in one fund ↓
Only in PULS
PGIM AAA CLO ETF 1.81%
Phillips 66 0% CP 22/06/2026, due Jun 22, 2026 0.83%
GLENCORE FUNDING LLC 0% CP 17/06/2026, due Jun 17, 2026 0.74%
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. 0% CP 01/06/2026, due Jun 1, 2026 0.66%
INTESA SANPAOLO SPA NEW YORK BRANCH 4.27% CP 30/06/2026, due Jun 30, 2026 0.63%
ABNANV 4.718 01/22/27 144A, due Jan 22, 2027 0.57%
Healthpeak Properties Inc 0% CP 24/06/2026, due Jun 24, 2026 0.52%
BX 2022-LBA6 A, due Jan 18, 2039 0.51%
Only in SCHP
U.S. Treasury Inflation-Indexed Notes, due Jul 15, 2035 4.07%
U.S. Treasury Inflation-Indexed Notes, due Jan 15, 2035 4.01%
U.S. Treasury Inflation-Indexed Notes, due Jan 15, 2036 4.00%
U.S. Treasury Inflation-Indexed Notes, due Jul 15, 2034 3.77%
U.S. Treasury Inflation-Indexed Notes, due Jan 15, 2034 3.60%
U.S. Treasury Inflation-Indexed Notes, due Oct 15, 2030 3.40%
U.S. Treasury Inflation-Indexed Notes, due Apr 15, 2030 3.38%
U.S. Treasury Inflation-Indexed Notes, due Jan 15, 2033 3.36%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Bond ETF
Issuer PGIM Schwab
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of US TIPS
Total return, 1 year +4.0% −0.8%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured −1.4% (AGG)
Gap to its benchmark not measured +0.6 pts vs AGG
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.03%
Holdings 553 48
Net assets, PULS as of Oct 27, 2026 and SCHP as of Jun 30, 2026 $19.8bn $16.5bn

PULS and SCHP on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-30C273A14C

PULS and SCHP do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. PULS follows No index, actively managed and SCHP follows US TIPS.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 PULS returned +4.0% and SCHP −0.8% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 4.8 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

PULS flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
PULS

PULS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

SCHP

SCHP tracks an index of US TIPS. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.8% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, PULS or SCHP?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PULS returned +4.0% and SCHP −0.8%.
Which is cheaper, PULS or SCHP?
SCHP is cheaper, by 0.12 percentage points a year. That is about $12 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, PULS against SCHP, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/puls-vs-schp

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.