Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EMB vs PULS: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

EMB's duration was 6.5 years on Jul 31, 2026 and PULS's 0.7 on May 29, 2026; PULS charges 0.15% to EMB's 0.39%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EMB and PULS

Net assets: $13.2bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF, and $19.8bn on Oct 27, 2026 for PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF.

At a glance
−0.4%
EMB total return, 1 year
+4.0%
PULS total return, 1 year
0.39%
EMB expense ratio
0.15%
PULS expense ratio

Pair scorecard

PULS costs 0.24 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.4 points; PULS is 1.5 times larger.

EMB vs PULS: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEMBPULS
Return
Total return, 1 year−0.4%+4.0%
Drawdown
Below its high3.5%, high on Jun 29, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksJ.P. Morgan EMBI Global Core IndexNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.39%0.15%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$13.2bn$19.8bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, EMB and PULS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EMB PULS
Only in one fund ↓
Only in EMB
Argentina Republic Government International Bonds, due Jul 9, 2035 1.21%
Ecuador Government International Bonds, due Jul 31, 2035 0.78%
Argentina Republic Government International Bonds, due Jan 9, 2038 0.70%
Argentina Republic Government International Bonds, due Jul 9, 2030 0.65%
Argentina Republic Government International Bonds, due Jul 9, 2041 0.57%
Ghana Government International Bonds, due Jul 3, 2035 0.55%
Uruguay Government International Bonds, due Jun 18, 2050 0.51%
Eagle Funding Luxco Sarl, due Aug 17, 2030 0.50%
Only in PULS
PGIM AAA CLO ETF 1.81%
Phillips 66 0% CP 22/06/2026, due Jun 22, 2026 0.83%
GLENCORE FUNDING LLC 0% CP 17/06/2026, due Jun 17, 2026 0.74%
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. 0% CP 01/06/2026, due Jun 1, 2026 0.66%
INTESA SANPAOLO SPA NEW YORK BRANCH 4.27% CP 30/06/2026, due Jun 30, 2026 0.63%
ABNANV 4.718 01/22/27 144A, due Jan 22, 2027 0.57%
Healthpeak Properties Inc 0% CP 24/06/2026, due Jun 24, 2026 0.52%
BX 2022-LBA6 A, due Jan 18, 2039 0.51%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

EMB iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Bond ETF
Issuer iShares PGIM
What it is Tracks the J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond Actively managed
Total return, 1 year −0.4% +4.0%
Expense ratio 0.39% 0.15%
Holdings 622 553
Net assets, EMB as of Oct 28, 2026 and PULS as of Oct 27, 2026 $13.2bn $19.8bn

EMB and PULS on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

EMB and PULS flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EMB

EMB tracks the J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. It sat 3.5% below its high of Jun 29, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

PULS

PULS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EMB or PULS?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMB returned −0.4% and PULS +4.0%.
Which is cheaper, EMB or PULS?
PULS is cheaper, by 0.24 percentage points a year. That is about $24 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EMB against PULS, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/emb-vs-puls

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.