Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
EMB vs USFR: how they differ
EMB and USFR hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and USFR returned more over the year.
iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, EMB and USFR hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in EMB | Only in USFR |
|---|---|
| BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY 0.84% | UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 28.04% |
| EAGLE FUNDING LUXCO SARL RegS 0.50% | UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 28.01% |
| UKRAINE (REPUBLIC OF) C BONDS RegS 0.42% | UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 28.00% |
| ECUADOR REPUBLIC OF (GOVERNMENT) RegS 0.34% | UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 15.95% |
| GHANA (REPUBLIC OF) DISCO RegS 0.31% | |
| CHINA LIFE INSURANCE OVERSEAS CO L RegS 0.28% | |
| REPUBLIC OF HUNGARY 0.27% | |
| ANGOLA (REPUBLIC OF) RegS 0.26% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.
| EMB iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF | USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | WisdomTree |
| What it is | J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond | Floating Rate Treasury |
| Total return, 1 year | +2.8% | +4.1% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −14.7 pts | −13.4 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.39% | 0.15% |
| Holdings | 612 | 4 |
EMB in plain words
EMB is a bond fund tracking the J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year.
USFR in plain words
USFR is a bond fund tracking the Floating Rate Treasury. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, EMB or USFR?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMB returned +2.8% and USFR returned +4.1%, so USFR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, EMB or USFR?
- EMB charges 0.39% a year and USFR charges 0.15%, so USFR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, EMB against USFR, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/emb-vs-usfr Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources