Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

BIL vs EWT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BIL returned +3.7% to EWT's +69.9%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BIL and EWT

Net assets: $48.7bn on Oct 27, 2026 for SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF, and $12.0bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF.

At a glance
+3.7%
BIL total return, 1 year
+69.9%
EWT total return, 1 year
0.14%
BIL expense ratio
0.59%
EWT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

BIL costs 0.45 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 66.2 points; BIL is 4.1 times larger.

BIL vs EWT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBILEWT
Return
Total return, 1 year+3.7%+69.9%
Drawdown
Below its high7.7%, high on Oct 5, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksBloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill IndexMSCI Taiwan 25/50 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.14%0.59%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$48.7bn$11.8bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund47.7%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, BIL and EWT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first BIL EWT
Only in one fund ↓
Only in BIL
TREASURY BILL 12/26 0.00000 7.94%
TREASURY BILL 12/26 0.00000 6.66%
TREASURY BILL 12/26 0.00000 6.46%
TREASURY BILL 12/26 0.00000 6.40%
TREASURY BILL 12/26 0.00000 6.39%
TREASURY BILL 11/26 0.00000 6.26%
TREASURY BILL 12/26 0.00000 6.21%
TREASURY BILL 11/26 0.00000 4.85%
Only in EWT
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 22.12%
MEDIATEK 6.03%
HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY 3.31%
DELTA ELECTRONICS 3.25%
ASE TECHNOLOGY HOLDING 2.86%
NAN YA PLASTICS CORP 2.54%
UNIMICRON TECHNOLOGY 2.04%
ELITE MATERIAL 1.88%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF EWT iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of 1-3 month T-bills Tracks the MSCI Taiwan
Total return, 1 year +3.7% +69.9%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +16.3% (EEM)
Gap to its benchmark not measured +53.6 pts vs EEM
Expense ratio 0.14% 0.59%
Holdings 26 79
Net assets, BIL as of Oct 27, 2026 and EWT as of Oct 28, 2026 $48.7bn $12.0bn

BIL and EWT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

BIL and EWT flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BIL

BIL tracks an index of 1-3 month T-bills. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +3.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year.

EWT

EWT tracks the MSCI Taiwan. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +69.9% with distributions reinvested, against +16.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 79 positions, with the top ten at 47.7%. It sat 7.7% below its high of Oct 5, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BIL or EWT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BIL returned +3.7% and EWT +69.9%.
Which is cheaper, BIL or EWT?
BIL is cheaper, by 0.45 percentage points a year. That is about $45 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BIL against EWT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bil-vs-ewt

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.