Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
BIL vs EWT: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BIL returned +3.7% to EWT's +69.9%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about BIL and EWTNet assets: $48.7bn on Oct 27, 2026 for SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF, and $12.0bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF.
Pair scorecard
BIL costs 0.45 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 66.2 points; BIL is 4.1 times larger.
| Measure | BIL | EWT |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +3.7% | +69.9% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 7.7%, high on Oct 5, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index | MSCI Taiwan 25/50 Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.14% | 0.59% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $48.7bn | $11.8bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 47.7% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, BIL and EWT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
BIL and EWT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BIL
BIL tracks an index of 1-3 month T-bills. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +3.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year.
EWT
EWT tracks the MSCI Taiwan. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +69.9% with distributions reinvested, against +16.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 79 positions, with the top ten at 47.7%. It sat 7.7% below its high of Oct 5, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BIL or EWT?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BIL returned +3.7% and EWT +69.9%.
- Which is cheaper, BIL or EWT?
- BIL is cheaper, by 0.45 percentage points a year. That is about $45 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BIL against EWT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bil-vs-ewt
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). BIL against EWT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bil-vs-ewt
[BIL against EWT (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bil-vs-ewt)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.