Which returned more over the last year, BIL or EFA?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BIL returned +3.7% and EFA returned +18.2%, so EFA returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, BIL or EFA?

BIL charges 0.14% a year and EFA charges 0.32%, so BIL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BIL vs EFA: how they differ

BIL is a short-term Treasury fund and EFA an equity index fund, and over the year EFA returned more, +18.2% against +3.7%.

SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF and iShares MSCI EAFE ETF.

BIL and EFA on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF	EFA iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	State Street	iShares
What it is	1-3 month T-bills	Developed markets ex US
Total return, 1 year	+3.7%	+18.2%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−13.8 pts	+0.7 pts
Expense ratio	0.14%	0.32%
Holdings	not filed	670

BIL in plain words

BIL is a cash and treasury bills tracking the 1-3 month T-bills. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +3.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year.

EFA in plain words

EFA is an index equity fund tracking the Developed markets ex US. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 670 positions, with the top ten at 13.8%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BIL or EFA?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BIL returned +3.7% and EFA returned +18.2%, so EFA returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, BIL or EFA?: BIL charges 0.14% a year and EFA charges 0.32%, so BIL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BIL against EFA, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BIL against EFA, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bil-vs-efa Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources