Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EFA vs MINT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EFA returned +12.1% to MINT's +4.2%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EFA and MINT

Net assets: $76.8bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares MSCI EAFE ETF, and $16.4bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund.

At a glance
+12.1%
EFA total return, 1 year
+4.2%
MINT total return, 1 year
0.32%
EFA expense ratio
0.36%
MINT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

EFA costs 0.04 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.9 points.

EFA vs MINT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEFAMINT
Return
Total return, 1 year+12.1%+4.2%
Drawdown
Below its high4.7%, high on Aug 25, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI EAFE IndexNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.32%0.36%
Net assets, EFA as of Oct 27, 2026 and MINT as of Jun 30, 2026$76.8bn$16.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund14.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, EFA and MINT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EFA MINT
Only in one fund ↓
Only in EFA
ASML HOLDING 2.98%
ROCHE PS PAR AG 1.58%
SHELL 1.42%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 1.38%
NOVARTIS AG 1.33%
ASTRAZENECA PLC 1.21%
NESTLE SA 1.21%
SAP 1.13%
Only in MINT
United States Treasury 6.21%
Fannie Mae 1.12%
Freddie Mac 0.99%
SUMISHO AIR LEASE CORP 0.87%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.77%
AERCAP IRELAND CAP/GLOBA 0.77%
Trillium Credit Card Trust II 0.71%
INTL BK RECON & DEVELOP 0.70%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

EFA iShares MSCI EAFE ETF MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
Issuer iShares PIMCO
What it is Tracks an index of Developed markets ex US Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +12.1% +4.2%
Its benchmark over the same days +14.3% (ACWX) not measured
Gap to its benchmark −2.2 pts vs ACWX not measured
Expense ratio 0.32% 0.36%
Holdings 665 977
Net assets, EFA as of Oct 27, 2026 and MINT as of Jun 30, 2026 $76.8bn $16.4bn

EFA and MINT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

EFA flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EFA

EFA tracks an index of Developed markets ex US. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +12.1% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 665 positions, with the top ten at 14.3%. It sat 4.7% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

MINT

MINT is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EFA or MINT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EFA returned +12.1% and MINT +4.2%.
Which is cheaper, EFA or MINT?
EFA is cheaper, by 0.04 percentage points a year. That is about $4 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EFA against MINT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/efa-vs-mint

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.