BGIG vs JAVA: Differences, Returns & Fees

BGIG and JAVA hold 19% of their weight in the same names, and JAVA returned +20.3% over the year. Net assets: $2.2bn on Jun 30, 2026 for Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF, and $7.2bn on Oct 9, 2026 for JPMorgan Active Value ETF.

JAVA costs 0.01 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.8 points; JAVA is 3.1 times larger.

BGIG vs JAVA: Differences, Returns & Fees
BGIGJAVA
Expense ratio0.45%0.44%
Net assets, as of Jun 30, 2026$2.2bn$6.7bn
Total return, 1 year+13.5%+20.3%
What it tracksNo index, actively managedNo index, actively managed
Holdings in common19%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund39.7%30.6%
Below its high3.8%, high on Aug 13, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+13.5%
BGIG total return, 1 year
+20.3%
JAVA total return, 1 year
0.45%
BGIG expense ratio
0.44%
JAVA expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BGIG and JAVA hold 19% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

19% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding BGIG JAVA
Microsoft Corp 3.39% 6.31%
AbbVie Inc 3.51% 1.82%
Johnson & Johnson 4.03% 1.28%
Chevron Corp 2.13% 1.22%
NextEra Energy Inc 2.24% 1.18%
UnitedHealth Group Inc 4.84% 1.18%
Philip Morris International In 1.48% 1.12%
Eaton Corp PLC 1.61% 1.02%
RTX Corp 1.39% 0.97%
Sempra 1.59% 0.62%
Mondelez International Inc 1.65% 0.58%
Union Pacific Corp 0.68% 0.58%
Only in BGIG
Broadcom Inc 4.87%
PNC Financial Services Group I 4.11%
Apollo Global Management Inc 3.19%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 2.96%
Cisco Systems Inc 2.80%
TE Connectivity PLC 2.15%
Garmin Ltd 2.09%
Cummins Inc 2.05%
Only in JAVA
AMAZON.COM INC COMMON 7.76%
APPLE INC COMMON STOCK 3.93%
BANK OF AMERICA CORP 2.19%
WELLS FARGO & CO COMMON 2.17%
CONOCOPHILLIPS COMMON 1.82%
CHARLES SCHWAB CORP/THE 1.64%
META PLATFORMS INC 1.55%
CITIGROUP INC COMMON 1.39%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

BGIG
Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF
JAVA
JPMorgan Active Value ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +13.5% +20.3%
Its benchmark over the same days not published +26.4% (IWD)
Gap to its benchmark not available −6.2 pts vs IWD
Expense ratio 0.45% 0.44%
Already in the S&P 500 94.5% 90.4%
Holdings 50 151
Net assets, BGIG as of Jun 30, 2026 and JAVA as of Oct 9, 2026 $2.2bn $7.2bn

BGIG and JAVA on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About BGIG

BGIG is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +13.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.45% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 50 positions, with the top ten at 39.7%. It sat 3.8% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

About JAVA

JAVA is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.44% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 151 positions, with the top ten at 30.6%.

Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +20.3% with distributions reinvested, against +26.4% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BGIG or JAVA?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BGIG returned +13.5% and JAVA +20.3%.
Which is cheaper, BGIG or JAVA?
JAVA is cheaper, by 0.01 percentage points a year. That is about $1 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do BGIG and JAVA overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 94% of BGIG and 90% of JAVA by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BGIG against JAVA, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bgig-vs-java

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.