Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
AOR vs EZU: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, AOR returned +7.8% to EZU's +7.1%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about AOR and EZU
Net assets: $3.9bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF, and $9.2bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF.
Pair scorecard
AOR costs 0.35 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.7 points; EZU is 2.4 times larger.
| Measure | AOR | EZU |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +7.8% | +7.1% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 8.7%, high on Aug 14, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | 60/40 Balanced Allocation | MSCI EMU Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.50% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $3.9bn | $9.2bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 99.9% | 30.5% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Nov 21, 2008 to Oct 23, 2026 · 935 weekly returnsEach against its own benchmark: AOR against ACWI, Nov 21, 2008 to Oct 23, 2026; EZU against ACWX, Apr 11, 2008 to Oct 23, 2026.
AOR returned more: +374.6% to +326.0%. AOR swung less: 12.6% to 22.6%. AOR fell less at its worst: −24.1% to −40.3%.
Full scorecard
19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | AOR | EZU | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +374.6% | +326.0% | AOR | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +9.0% | +8.4% | AOR (slight) | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +209.7% | +156.2% | AOR | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 12.6% | 22.6% | AOR | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 7.9% | 15.8% | AOR | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −24.1% | −40.3% | AOR | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Upside capture | 53.1% | 119.8% | Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose. | |
| Downside capture | 70.7% | 107.7% | Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better. | |
| Beta | 0.64 | 1.12 | Not an edge | How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves. |
| R squared | 0.77 | 0.88 | Not an edge | Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.63 | 0.41 | AOR | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 1.01 | 0.58 | AOR | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Treynor | 0.124 | 0.046 | Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta. | |
| Calmar | 0.38 | 0.21 | AOR | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
| Against the benchmark | ||||
| Benchmark | ACWI | ACWX | The ETF each fund is measured against. | |
| Alpha | +0.5% a year | −0.5% a year | Not significant | Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts. |
| Alpha t-stat | 0.36 | −0.24 | Not an edge | How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance. |
| Alpha range | −2.3% to +3.3% | −4.2% to +3.3% | Includes zero | The 95% range for the yearly alpha. |
| Information ratio | −0.42 | 0.02 | Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error. | |
| Tracking error | 8.6% | 8.6% | Not an edge | How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 935 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, AOR and EZU hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
AOR and EZU on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AOR and EZU do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. AOR follows 60/40 Balanced Allocation and EZU follows MSCI EMU Index.
- Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
- Number of holdings. AOR holds 7 positions and EZU holds 216.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
AOR
AOR tracks an index of 60/40 Balanced Allocation. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI All Country World Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 7 positions, with the top ten at 99.9%.
EZU
EZU tracks the MSCI Eurozone. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.1% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.50% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 216 positions, with the top ten at 30.5%. It sat 8.7% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, AOR or EZU?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AOR returned +7.8% and EZU +7.1%.
- Which is cheaper, AOR or EZU?
- AOR is cheaper, by 0.35 percentage points a year. That is about $35 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, AOR against EZU, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/aor-vs-ezu
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). AOR against EZU. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/aor-vs-ezu
[AOR against EZU (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/aor-vs-ezu)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.