ACWX vs HEFA: Differences, Returns & Fees
ACWX and HEFA hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and HEFA returned +19.3% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $17.6bn for iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF and $7.5bn for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF.
ACWX costs 0.03 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.1 points; ACWX is 2.3 times larger.
| ACWX | HEFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.32% | 0.35% |
| Net assets | $17.6bn | $7.5bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +18.2% | +19.3% |
| What it tracks | MSCI ACWI ex USA Index | not read by ETFIQ |
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 16.6% | 100.0% |
| Below its high | 3.9%, high on Sep 4, 2026 | 3.2%, high on Aug 13, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ACWX and HEFA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
half
0% in common
On the same fields
ACWX and HEFA on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACWX in plain words
ACWX tracks the MSCI ACWI ex U.S.. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +18.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,908 positions, with the top ten at 16.6%. It sat 3.9% below its high of Sep 4, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
HEFA in plain words
HEFA tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +19.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 97 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%. It sat 3.2% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, ACWX or HEFA?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWX returned +18.2% and HEFA +19.3%.
- Which is cheaper, ACWX or HEFA?
- ACWX is cheaper, by 0.03 percentage points a year. That is about $3 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, ACWX against HEFA, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwx-vs-hefa
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). ACWX against HEFA. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwx-vs-hefa
[ACWX against HEFA (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwx-vs-hefa)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.