CORO vs HEFA: Differences, Returns & Fees

CORO and HEFA hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and CORO returned +22.5% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $13.1bn for iShares International Country Rotation Active ETF and $7.5bn for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF.

HEFA costs 0.20 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.2 points; CORO is 1.7 times larger.

COROHEFA
Expense ratio0.55%0.35%
Net assets$13.1bn$7.5bn
Total return, 1 year+22.5%+19.3%
What it tracksNo index, actively managednot read by ETFIQ
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund77.4%100.0%
Below its high3.6%, high on Sep 4, 20263.2%, high on Aug 13, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.

+22.5%
CORO total return, 1 year
+19.3%
HEFA total return, 1 year
0.55%
CORO expense ratio
0.35%
HEFA expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CORO and HEFA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding CORO HEFA
Only in CORO
ISHARES MSCI JAPAN ETF 19.62%
ISHARES MSCI CANADA ETF 13.40%
ISHARES MSCI SWITZERLAND ETF 8.76%
ISHARES MSCI SOUTH KOREA ETF 6.16%
ISHARES MSCI TAIWAN CAP ETF 6.07%
ISHARES MSCI SWEDEN ETF 5.23%
ISHARES MSCI UNITED KINGDOM ETF 5.22%
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 4.85%
Only in HEFA
ISHARES MSCI EAFE ETF 99.10%
EUR/USD 0.52%
JPY/USD 0.26%
GBP/USD 0.07%
DKK/USD 0.02%
JPY/USD 0.01%
SEK/USD 0.01%
SGD/USD 0.01%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

CORO
iShares International Country Rotation Active ETF
HEFA
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +22.5% +19.3%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 +5.2 pts +2.0 pts
Expense ratio 0.55% 0.35%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 27 97
Net assets $13.1bn $7.5bn

CORO and HEFA on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

CORO in plain words

CORO is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +22.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.55% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 27 positions, with the top ten at 77.4%. It sat 3.6% below its high of Sep 4, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

HEFA in plain words

HEFA tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +19.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 97 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%. It sat 3.2% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CORO or HEFA?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CORO returned +22.5% and HEFA +19.3%.
Which is cheaper, CORO or HEFA?
HEFA is cheaper, by 0.20 percentage points a year. That is about $20 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do CORO and HEFA overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of CORO and 0% of HEFA by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CORO against HEFA, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/coro-vs-hefa

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.