Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

MFUT vs RSBT: which moved less with stocks?

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, MFUT moved less with the S&P 500 than RSBT: correlation +0.29 against +0.39.

Cambria Chesapeake Pure Trend ETF and Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF.

+0.29MFUT correlation with the S&P 500
+0.39RSBT correlation with the S&P 500
−15.9%MFUT down-week capture
9.2%RSBT down-week capture

ETFIQ Diversifier Score: MFUT scores higher

How much does it diversify a stock portfolio?

MFUT 76.2RSBT 60.34.8, the lowest in this set98.0, the highest

A percentile among the 63 alternatives ETFs with a full year. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All alternatives ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

MFUTRose when the S&P 500 fell
SPY−1.24%MFUT+0.20%Average week when SPY fell: 22 of 52, year to Sep 18, 2026SPY−1.24%MFUT+0.20%Average week when SPY fell
RSBTFell 9% as much as the S&P 500
SPY−1.24%RSBT−0.11%Average week when SPY fell: 22 of 52, year to Sep 18, 2026SPY−1.24%RSBT−0.11%Average week when SPY fell

One strategy, two funds

MFUT and RSBT both run a managed futures strategy. Over the same 52 weeks to Sep 18, 2026, MFUT’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.29 with the S&P 500 and RSBT’s +0.39. In the 22 weeks the index fell, by 1.24% a week on average, MFUT averaged +0.20% and RSBT −0.11%. Over the same weeks, MFUT finished 27.5 percentage points ahead of cash and RSBT finished 14.4 points ahead of cash.

Performance, window by window

MFUT and RSBT over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnvs the S&P 500
MFUTRSBTMFUTRSBT
3 months+5.4%+1.5%+3.2 pts−0.8 pts
6 months+16.4%+4.6%−1.6 pts−13.5 pts
1 year+31.0%+17.9%+14.4 pts+1.3 pts
3 yearsnot published+14.4%not published−64.0 pts
Since launch+0.3%+2.5%−48.7 pts−92.0 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
MFUT and RSBT on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MFUT
Cambria Chesapeake Pure Trend ETF
Managed futures fund: follows price trends in futures on stocks, bonds, currencies and commodities, and can bet on falls as well as rises
RSBT
Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF
Managed futures fund: follows price trends in futures on stocks, bonds, currencies and commodities, and can bet on falls as well as rises
IssuerCambriaReturn Stacked
StrategyManaged futuresManaged futures
Correlation with the S&P 500+0.29+0.39
Beta to the S&P 500+0.28+0.34
Down-week capture−15.9%9.2%
Average week when the S&P 500 fell+0.20%−0.11%
The S&P 500 in those weeks−1.24%−1.24%
Total return, same 52 weeks+31.1%+18.0%
Against T-bills, percentage points+27.5 pts+14.4 pts
Expense ratio1.18%1.01%
ListedMay 29, 2024Feb 8, 2023
Net assets$39m$127m

MFUT in plain words

MFUT is a managed futures fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.29 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.28, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.28% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 22 of those 52 weeks, by 1.24% on average. In the same weeks MFUT rose 0.20% on average, a down-week capture of −15.9%. Over the same 52 weeks MFUT returned +31.1% and a Treasury bill fund +3.6%, so it finished 27.5 percentage points ahead of cash.

RSBT in plain words

RSBT is a managed futures fund. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.39 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.34, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.34% the same way. In the same weeks RSBT fell 0.11% on average, a down-week capture of 9.2%. Over the same 52 weeks RSBT returned +18.0% and a Treasury bill fund +3.6%, so it finished 14.4 percentage points ahead of cash.

Questions people ask

Which moved less with the S&P 500, MFUT or RSBT?
Over the 52 weeks to Sep 18, 2026, MFUT’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.29 with the S&P 500 and RSBT’s +0.39, so MFUT moved less with the index.
Which did better when the S&P 500 fell, MFUT or RSBT?
In the 22 weeks the S&P 500 fell, by 1.24% a week on average, MFUT averaged +0.20% and RSBT −0.11%, so MFUT returned more in those weeks.
Which earned more than cash, MFUT or RSBT?
Over the same weeks, MFUT finished 27.5 percentage points ahead of cash and RSBT finished 14.4 percentage points ahead of cash. Cash here is BIL, a fund of Treasury bills.
Which is cheaper, MFUT or RSBT?
MFUT charges 1.18% a year and RSBT charges 1.01%, so RSBT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MFUT against RSBT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MFUT against RSBT, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/alternatives/mfut-vs-rsbt Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources