Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

MFUT vs TFPN: which moved less with stocks?

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, MFUT moved less with the S&P 500 than TFPN: correlation +0.29 against +0.46.

Cambria Chesapeake Pure Trend ETF and Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF.

+0.29MFUT correlation with the S&P 500
+0.46TFPN correlation with the S&P 500
−15.9%MFUT down-week capture
25.7%TFPN down-week capture

ETFIQ Diversifier Score: MFUT scores higher

How much does it diversify a stock portfolio?

MFUT 76.2TFPN 52.44.8, the lowest in this set98.0, the highest

A percentile among the 63 alternatives ETFs with a full year. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All alternatives ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

MFUTRose when the S&P 500 fell
SPY−1.24%MFUT+0.20%Average week when SPY fell: 22 of 52, year to Sep 18, 2026SPY−1.24%MFUT+0.20%Average week when SPY fell
TFPNFell 26% as much as the S&P 500
SPY−1.24%TFPN−0.32%Average week when SPY fell: 22 of 52, year to Sep 18, 2026SPY−1.24%TFPN−0.32%Average week when SPY fell

One strategy, two funds

MFUT and TFPN both run a managed futures strategy. Over the same 52 weeks to Sep 18, 2026, MFUT’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.29 with the S&P 500 and TFPN’s +0.46. In the 22 weeks the index fell, by 1.24% a week on average, MFUT averaged +0.20% and TFPN −0.32%. Over the same weeks, MFUT finished 27.5 percentage points ahead of cash and TFPN finished 18.9 points ahead of cash.

Performance, window by window

MFUT and TFPN over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnvs the S&P 500
MFUTTFPNMFUTTFPN
3 months+5.4%−6.7%+3.2 pts−9.0 pts
6 months+16.4%+10.2%−1.6 pts−7.8 pts
1 year+31.0%+24.3%+14.4 pts+7.8 pts
3 yearsnot published+23.5%not published−54.9 pts
Since launch+0.3%+23.2%−48.7 pts−54.5 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
MFUT and TFPN on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MFUT
Cambria Chesapeake Pure Trend ETF
Managed futures fund: follows price trends in futures on stocks, bonds, currencies and commodities, and can bet on falls as well as rises
TFPN
Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF
Managed futures fund: follows price trends in futures on stocks, bonds, currencies and commodities, and can bet on falls as well as rises
IssuerCambriaBlueprint
StrategyManaged futuresManaged futures
Correlation with the S&P 500+0.29+0.46
Beta to the S&P 500+0.28+0.49
Down-week capture−15.9%25.7%
Average week when the S&P 500 fell+0.20%−0.32%
The S&P 500 in those weeks−1.24%−1.24%
Total return, same 52 weeks+31.1%+22.5%
Against T-bills, percentage points+27.5 pts+18.9 pts
Expense ratio1.18%1.96%
ListedMay 29, 2024Jul 12, 2023
Net assets$39m$170m

MFUT in plain words

MFUT is a managed futures fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.29 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.28, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.28% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 22 of those 52 weeks, by 1.24% on average. In the same weeks MFUT rose 0.20% on average, a down-week capture of −15.9%. Over the same 52 weeks MFUT returned +31.1% and a Treasury bill fund +3.6%, so it finished 27.5 percentage points ahead of cash.

TFPN in plain words

TFPN is a managed futures fund. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.46 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.49, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.49% the same way. In the same weeks TFPN fell 0.32% on average, a down-week capture of 25.7%. Over the same 52 weeks TFPN returned +22.5% and a Treasury bill fund +3.6%, so it finished 18.9 percentage points ahead of cash.

Questions people ask

Which moved less with the S&P 500, MFUT or TFPN?
Over the 52 weeks to Sep 18, 2026, MFUT’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.29 with the S&P 500 and TFPN’s +0.46, so MFUT moved less with the index.
Which did better when the S&P 500 fell, MFUT or TFPN?
In the 22 weeks the S&P 500 fell, by 1.24% a week on average, MFUT averaged +0.20% and TFPN −0.32%, so MFUT returned more in those weeks.
Which earned more than cash, MFUT or TFPN?
Over the same weeks, MFUT finished 27.5 percentage points ahead of cash and TFPN finished 18.9 percentage points ahead of cash. Cash here is BIL, a fund of Treasury bills.
Which is cheaper, MFUT or TFPN?
MFUT charges 1.18% a year and TFPN charges 1.96%, so MFUT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MFUT against TFPN, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MFUT against TFPN, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/alternatives/mfut-vs-tfpn Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources