Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
MFUT vs TFPN: Correlation to the S&P 500
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, MFUT moved less with the S&P 500 than TFPN: correlation +0.54 against +0.75.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about MFUT and TFPN
Net assets on Jun 30, 2026: $39m for Cambria Chesapeake Pure Trend ETF and $170m for Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF.
MFUT in the 26 weeks SPY fell, year to Nov 4, 2026: SPY averaged −1.07%, MFUT −0.96%.
TFPN in the 26 weeks SPY fell, year to Nov 4, 2026: SPY averaged −1.07%, TFPN −1.32%.
Pair scorecard
MFUT costs 0.24 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.6 points; TFPN is 4.4 times larger.
| Measure | MFUT | TFPN |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +22.8% | +14.2% |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Treasury bills, 52 weeks | +3.7% | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.89% | 1.13% |
| Net assets, as of Jun 30, 2026 | $39m | $170m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
| Risk | ||
| Beta to the S&P 500 | +0.74: about 0.74% for each 1% | +1.00: about 1.00% for each 1% |
| Its average week when the S&P 500 fell | fell 0.96% | fell 1.32% |
How much it diversifies a stock portfolio, ranked against 17 systematic trend alternatives ETFs with a full year. 100 is best. How it is computed
One year of weekly moves against the S&P 500, within one strategy; it ignores what the fund returned. All alternatives ETFs ranked by it →
Risk and return
Jun 7, 2024 to Oct 30, 2026 · 125 weekly returnsFrom Jun 2024 to Oct 2026, TFPN returned more: +17.0% to −0.6%. MFUT and TFPN swung about the same: 11.7% and 11.8%. TFPN fell less at its worst: −15.2% to −27.6%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | MFUT | TFPN | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | −0.6% | +17.0% | TFPN | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | −0.3% | +6.8% | TFPN | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | −1.0% | +16.0% | TFPN | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 11.7% | 11.8% | Tie | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 8.9% | 8.7% | TFPN (slight) | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −27.6% | −15.2% | TFPN | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | −0.33 | 0.26 | TFPN | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | −0.42 | 0.35 | TFPN | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | −0.01 | 0.44 | TFPN | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 125 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
Window by window
| Total return | vs its benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | MFUT | TFPN | MFUT | TFPN |
| 3 months | −2.0% | −3.4% | not measured | −3.3 pts vs VOO |
| 6 months | −1.4% | −8.5% | not measured | −13.5 pts vs VOO |
| 1 year | +22.8% | +14.2% | not measured | −0.6 pts vs VOO |
| 3 years | – | +18.6% | – | −64.7 pts vs VOO |
| Since launchNot the same days: MFUT May 2024 · TFPN Jul 2023 | −5.4% | +17.8% | not measured | −61.6 pts vs VOO |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
One strategy, two funds
MFUT and TFPN both run a managed futures strategy. Over the same 52 weeks to Nov 4, 2026, MFUT’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.54 with the S&P 500 and TFPN’s +0.75. In the 26 weeks the index fell, by 1.07% a week on average, MFUT averaged −0.96% and TFPN −1.32%. Over the same weeks, MFUT finished 19.1 percentage points ahead of cash and TFPN finished 10.8 points ahead of cash.
Client brief:
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
MFUT
MFUT is a managed futures fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.54 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.74, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.74% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 26 of those 52 weeks, by 1.07% on average. In the same weeks MFUT fell 0.96% on average, a down-week capture of 89.9%. Over the same 52 weeks MFUT returned +22.8% and a Treasury bill fund +3.7%, so it finished 19.1 percentage points ahead of cash.
TFPN
TFPN is a managed futures fund. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.75 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +1.00, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 1.00% the same way. In the same weeks TFPN fell 1.32% on average, a down-week capture of 123.6%. Over the same 52 weeks TFPN returned +14.4% and a Treasury bill fund +3.7%, so it finished 10.8 percentage points ahead of cash.
Questions people ask
- Which moved less with the S&P 500, MFUT or TFPN?
- Over the 52 weeks to Nov 4, 2026, MFUT’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.54 with the S&P 500 and TFPN’s +0.75, so MFUT moved less with the index.
- Which did better when the S&P 500 fell, MFUT or TFPN?
- In the 26 weeks the S&P 500 fell, by 1.07% a week on average, MFUT averaged −0.96% and TFPN −1.32%, so MFUT returned more in those weeks.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, MFUT against TFPN, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/alternatives/mfut-vs-tfpn
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). MFUT against TFPN. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/alternatives/mfut-vs-tfpn
[MFUT against TFPN (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/alternatives/mfut-vs-tfpn)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.