Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Alternative ETFs

MFUT vs PRAE: Correlation to the S&P 500

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, MFUT moved less with the S&P 500 than PRAE: correlation +0.54 against +0.79.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about MFUT and PRAE

Net assets on Jun 30, 2026: $39m for Cambria Chesapeake Pure Trend ETF and $12m for PlanRock Equity Plus Alternatives ETF.

At a glance
+0.54
MFUT correlation with the S&P 500
+0.79
PRAE correlation with the S&P 500
89.9%
MFUT down-week capture
120.0%
PRAE down-week capture
MFUT Fell 90% as much as the S&P 500
Fell 90% as much as the S&P 500MFUT in the 26 weeks SPY fell, year to Nov 4, 2026: SPY averaged −1.07%, MFUT −0.96%.SPY−1.07%MFUT−0.96%Average week when SPY fell: 26 of 52, year to Nov 4, 2026Fell 90% as much as the S&P 500MFUT in the 26 weeks SPY fell, year to Nov 4, 2026: SPY averaged −1.07%, MFUT −0.96%.SPY−1.07%MFUT−0.96%Average week when SPY fell

MFUT in the 26 weeks SPY fell, year to Nov 4, 2026: SPY averaged −1.07%, MFUT −0.96%.

PRAE Fell more than the S&P 500
Fell more than the S&P 500PRAE in the 26 weeks SPY fell, year to Nov 4, 2026: SPY averaged −1.07%, PRAE −1.29%.SPY−1.07%PRAE−1.29%Average week when SPY fell: 26 of 52, year to Nov 4, 2026Fell more than the S&P 500PRAE in the 26 weeks SPY fell, year to Nov 4, 2026: SPY averaged −1.07%, PRAE −1.29%.SPY−1.07%PRAE−1.29%Average week when SPY fell

PRAE in the 26 weeks SPY fell, year to Nov 4, 2026: SPY averaged −1.07%, PRAE −1.29%.

Pair scorecard

MFUT costs 0.60 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 9.5 points; MFUT is 3.3 times larger.

MFUT vs PRAE: Correlation to the S&P 500
MeasureMFUTPRAE
Return
Total return, 1 year+22.8%+13.3%
Against its benchmark
Treasury bills, 52 weeks+3.7%
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.89%1.49%
Net assets, as of Jun 30, 2026$39m$12m
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
Risk
Beta to the S&P 500+0.74: about 0.74% for each 1%+0.95: about 0.95% for each 1%
Its average week when the S&P 500 fellfell 0.96%fell 1.29%
ETFIQ Stock Diversification Score · MFUT scores higher How much does it diversify a stock portfolio?
IQ Alternatives Score29.4MFUT14.7PRAE

How much it diversifies a stock portfolio, ranked against 17 systematic trend alternatives ETFs with a full year. 100 is best. How it is computed

2.9, the lowest in this set 94.2, the highest

One year of weekly moves against the S&P 500, within one strategy; it ignores what the fund returned. All alternatives ETFs ranked by it →

Method

Risk and return

Jun 7, 2024 to Oct 30, 2026 · 125 weekly returns
MFUT PRAE
Return
Total return edge PRAE −0.6% +29.8%
Annualized edge PRAE −0.3% +11.5%
Price return edge PRAE −1.0% +27.6%
Risk
Volatility edge MFUT 11.7% 13.7%
Max drawdown edge PRAE −27.6% −17.3%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge PRAE −0.33 0.56
Sortino edge PRAE −0.42 0.79
Calmar edge PRAE −0.01 0.66
Reading

From Jun 2024 to Oct 2026, PRAE returned more: +29.8% to −0.6%. MFUT swung less: 11.7% to 13.7%. PRAE fell less at its worst: −17.3% to −27.6%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: MFUT vs PRAE: Correlation to the S&P 500
MeasureMFUTPRAEEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return−0.6%+29.8%PRAEPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized−0.3%+11.5%PRAETotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return−1.0%+27.6%PRAEPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility11.7%13.7%MFUTSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation8.9%9.6%MFUT (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−27.6%−17.3%PRAEDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe−0.330.56PRAEReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino−0.420.79PRAEReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar−0.010.66PRAEAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 125 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

Window by window

Window by window: MFUT vs PRAE: Correlation to the S&P 500
Total return
WindowMFUTPRAE
3 months−2.0%+0.2%
6 months−1.4%+0.9%
1 year+22.8%+13.3%
Since launchNot the same days: MFUT May 2024 · PRAE Dec 2023−5.4%+37.5%

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

MFUT Cambria Chesapeake Pure Trend ETF · Managed futures fund: follows price trends in futures on stocks, bonds, currencies and commodities, and can bet on falls as well as rises PRAE PlanRock Equity Plus Alternatives ETF · Managed futures fund: follows price trends in futures on stocks, bonds, currencies and commodities, and can bet on falls as well as rises
Issuer Cambria PlanRock
Strategy Managed futures Managed futures
Correlation with the S&P 500 +0.54 +0.79
Beta to the S&P 500 +0.74 +0.95
Down-week capture 89.9% 120.0%
Average week when the S&P 500 fell −0.96% −1.29%
The S&P 500 in those weeks −1.07% −1.07%
Total return, same 52 weeks +22.8% +13.1%
Against T-bills, percentage points +19.1 pts +9.5 pts
Expense ratio 0.89% 1.49%
First traded May 29, 2024 Dec 19, 2023
Net assets, as of Jun 30, 2026 $39m $12m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

One strategy, two funds

MFUT and PRAE both run a managed futures strategy. Over the same 52 weeks to Nov 4, 2026, MFUT’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.54 with the S&P 500 and PRAE’s +0.79. In the 26 weeks the index fell, by 1.07% a week on average, MFUT averaged −0.96% and PRAE −1.29%. Over the same weeks, MFUT finished 19.1 percentage points ahead of cash and PRAE finished 9.5 points ahead of cash.

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
MFUT

MFUT is a managed futures fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.54 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.74, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.74% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 26 of those 52 weeks, by 1.07% on average. In the same weeks MFUT fell 0.96% on average, a down-week capture of 89.9%. Over the same 52 weeks MFUT returned +22.8% and a Treasury bill fund +3.7%, so it finished 19.1 percentage points ahead of cash.

PRAE

PRAE is a managed futures fund. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.79 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.95, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.95% the same way. In the same weeks PRAE fell 1.29% on average, a down-week capture of 120.0%. Over the same 52 weeks PRAE returned +13.1% and a Treasury bill fund +3.7%, so it finished 9.5 percentage points ahead of cash.

Questions people ask

Which moved less with the S&P 500, MFUT or PRAE?
Over the 52 weeks to Nov 4, 2026, MFUT’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.54 with the S&P 500 and PRAE’s +0.79, so MFUT moved less with the index.
Which did better when the S&P 500 fell, MFUT or PRAE?
In the 26 weeks the S&P 500 fell, by 1.07% a week on average, MFUT averaged −0.96% and PRAE −1.29%, so MFUT returned more in those weeks.
Which earned more than cash, MFUT or PRAE?
Over the same weeks, MFUT finished 19.1 percentage points ahead of cash and PRAE finished 9.5 percentage points ahead of cash. Cash here is BIL, a fund of Treasury bills.
Which is cheaper, MFUT or PRAE?
MFUT charges 0.89% a year and PRAE charges 1.49%, so MFUT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MFUT against PRAE, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/alternatives/mfut-vs-prae

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.