Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

DBMF vs MFUT: which moved less with stocks?

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, DBMF moved less with the S&P 500 than MFUT: correlation +0.26 against +0.29.

iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF and Cambria Chesapeake Pure Trend ETF.

+0.26DBMF correlation with the S&P 500
+0.29MFUT correlation with the S&P 500
−16.8%DBMF down-week capture
−15.9%MFUT down-week capture

ETFIQ Diversifier Score: DBMF scores higher

How much does it diversify a stock portfolio?

DBMF 78.5MFUT 76.24.8, the lowest in this set98.0, the highest

A percentile among the 63 alternatives ETFs with a full year. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All alternatives ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

DBMFRose when the S&P 500 fell
SPY−1.24%DBMF+0.21%Average week when SPY fell: 22 of 52, year to Sep 18, 2026SPY−1.24%DBMF+0.21%Average week when SPY fell
MFUTRose when the S&P 500 fell
SPY−1.24%MFUT+0.20%Average week when SPY fell: 22 of 52, year to Sep 18, 2026SPY−1.24%MFUT+0.20%Average week when SPY fell

One strategy, two funds

DBMF and MFUT both run a managed futures strategy. Over the same 52 weeks to Sep 18, 2026, DBMF’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.26 with the S&P 500 and MFUT’s +0.29. In the 22 weeks the index fell, by 1.24% a week on average, DBMF averaged +0.21% and MFUT +0.20%. Over the same weeks, DBMF finished 21.7 percentage points ahead of cash and MFUT finished 27.5 points ahead of cash.

Performance, window by window

DBMF and MFUT over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnvs the S&P 500
DBMFMFUTDBMFMFUT
3 months+4.8%+5.4%+2.5 pts+3.2 pts
6 months+9.1%+16.4%−8.9 pts−1.6 pts
1 year+25.4%+31.0%+8.8 pts+14.4 pts
3 years+32.1%not published−46.3 ptsnot published
Since launch+96.5%+0.3%−99.2 pts−48.7 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
DBMF and MFUT on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DBMF
iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF
Managed futures fund: follows price trends in futures on stocks, bonds, currencies and commodities, and can bet on falls as well as rises
MFUT
Cambria Chesapeake Pure Trend ETF
Managed futures fund: follows price trends in futures on stocks, bonds, currencies and commodities, and can bet on falls as well as rises
IssueriMGPCambria
StrategyManaged futuresManaged futures
Correlation with the S&P 500+0.26+0.29
Beta to the S&P 500+0.20+0.28
Down-week capture−16.8%−15.9%
Average week when the S&P 500 fell+0.21%+0.20%
The S&P 500 in those weeks−1.24%−1.24%
Total return, same 52 weeks+25.4%+31.1%
Against T-bills, percentage points+21.7 pts+27.5 pts
Expense ratio0.85%1.18%
ListedMay 8, 2019May 29, 2024
Net assets$3.9bn$39m

DBMF in plain words

DBMF is a managed futures fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.26 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.20, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.20% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 22 of those 52 weeks, by 1.24% on average. In the same weeks DBMF rose 0.21% on average, a down-week capture of −16.8%. Over the same 52 weeks DBMF returned +25.4% and a Treasury bill fund +3.6%, so it finished 21.7 percentage points ahead of cash.

MFUT in plain words

MFUT is a managed futures fund. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.29 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.28, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.28% the same way. In the same weeks MFUT rose 0.20% on average, a down-week capture of −15.9%. Over the same 52 weeks MFUT returned +31.1% and a Treasury bill fund +3.6%, so it finished 27.5 percentage points ahead of cash.

Questions people ask

Which moved less with the S&P 500, DBMF or MFUT?
Over the 52 weeks to Sep 18, 2026, DBMF’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.26 with the S&P 500 and MFUT’s +0.29, so DBMF moved less with the index.
Which did better when the S&P 500 fell, DBMF or MFUT?
In the 22 weeks the S&P 500 fell, by 1.24% a week on average, DBMF averaged +0.21% and MFUT +0.20%, so DBMF returned more in those weeks.
Which earned more than cash, DBMF or MFUT?
Over the same weeks, DBMF finished 21.7 percentage points ahead of cash and MFUT finished 27.5 percentage points ahead of cash. Cash here is BIL, a fund of Treasury bills.
Which is cheaper, DBMF or MFUT?
DBMF charges 0.85% a year and MFUT charges 1.18%, so DBMF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DBMF against MFUT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DBMF against MFUT, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/alternatives/dbmf-vs-mfut Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources