Which did better when the S&P 500 fell, DBMF or MFUT?

In the 26 weeks the S&P 500 fell, by 1.07% a week on average, DBMF averaged −0.35% and MFUT −0.96%, so DBMF returned more in those weeks.

Which earned more than cash, DBMF or MFUT?

Over the same weeks, DBMF finished 14.3 percentage points ahead of cash and MFUT finished 19.1 percentage points ahead of cash. Cash here is BIL, a fund of Treasury bills.

Which is cheaper, DBMF or MFUT?

DBMF charges 0.85% a year and MFUT charges 0.89%, so DBMF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Alternative ETFs

DBMF vs MFUT: Correlation to the S&P 500

Share on X Download as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, DBMF moved less with the S&P 500 than MFUT: correlation +0.26 against +0.54.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about DBMF and MFUT

Net assets: $5.2bn on Nov 3, 2026 for iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF, and $39m on Jun 30, 2026 for Cambria Chesapeake Pure Trend ETF.

DBMF on its own →MFUT on its own →

At a glance

+0.26

DBMF correlation with the S&P 500

+0.54

MFUT correlation with the S&P 500

32.9%

DBMF down-week capture

89.9%

MFUT down-week capture

DBMF Fell 33% as much as the S&P 500

DBMF in the 26 weeks SPY fell, year to Nov 4, 2026: SPY averaged −1.07%, DBMF −0.35%.

MFUT Fell 90% as much as the S&P 500

MFUT in the 26 weeks SPY fell, year to Nov 4, 2026: SPY averaged −1.07%, MFUT −0.96%.

Pair scorecard

DBMF costs 0.04 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.3 points.

DBMF vs MFUT: Correlation to the S&P 500
Measure	DBMF	MFUT
Return
Measure	DBMF	MFUT
Total return, 1 year	+18.5%	+22.8%
Against its benchmark
Measure	DBMF	MFUT
Treasury bills, 52 weeks	+3.7%
Cost and size
Measure	DBMF	MFUT
Expense ratio	0.85%	0.89%
Net assets, DBMF as of Nov 3, 2026 and MFUT as of Jun 30, 2026	$5.2bn	$39m
Holdings
Measure	DBMF	MFUT
Holdings in common	not published
Risk
Measure	DBMF	MFUT
Beta to the S&P 500	+0.23: about 0.23% for each 1%	+0.74: about 0.74% for each 1%
Its average week when the S&P 500 fell	fell 0.35%	fell 0.96%

ETFIQ Stock Diversification Score · DBMF scores higher How much does it diversify a stock portfolio?

IQ Alternatives Score67.6DBMF29.4MFUT

How much it diversifies a stock portfolio, ranked against 17 systematic trend alternatives ETFs with a full year. 100 is best. How it is computed

DBMF 67.6

MFUT 29.4

2.9, the lowest in this set 94.2, the highest

One year of weekly moves against the S&P 500, within one strategy; it ignores what the fund returned. All alternatives ETFs ranked by it →

Method

Window by window

Window by window: DBMF vs MFUT: Correlation to the S&P 500
	Total return
Window	DBMF	MFUT
3 months	+3.0%	−2.0%
6 months	+4.4%	−1.4%
1 year	+18.5%	+22.8%
3 years	+31.9%	–
Since launchNot the same days: DBMF May 2019 · MFUT May 2024	+92.9%	−5.4%

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF · Managed futures fund: follows price trends in futures on stocks, bonds, currencies and commodities, and can bet on falls as well as rises MFUT Cambria Chesapeake Pure Trend ETF · Managed futures fund: follows price trends in futures on stocks, bonds, currencies and commodities, and can bet on falls as well as rises

Issuer iMGP Cambria

Strategy Managed futures Managed futures

Correlation with the S&P 500 +0.26 +0.54

Beta to the S&P 500 +0.23 +0.74

Down-week capture 32.9% 89.9%

Average week when the S&P 500 fell −0.35% −0.96%

The S&P 500 in those weeks −1.07% −1.07%

Total return, same 52 weeks +17.9% +22.8%

Against T-bills, percentage points +14.3 pts +19.1 pts

Expense ratio 0.85% 0.89%

First traded May 8, 2019 May 29, 2024

Net assets, DBMF as of Nov 3, 2026 and MFUT as of Jun 30, 2026 $5.2bn $39m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

One strategy, two funds

DBMF and MFUT both run a managed futures strategy. Over the same 52 weeks to Nov 4, 2026, DBMF’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.26 with the S&P 500 and MFUT’s +0.54. In the 26 weeks the index fell, by 1.07% a week on average, DBMF averaged −0.35% and MFUT −0.96%. Over the same weeks, DBMF finished 14.3 percentage points ahead of cash and MFUT finished 19.1 points ahead of cash.

Alert

About each fund

DBMF

DBMF is a managed futures fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.26 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.23, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.23% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 26 of those 52 weeks, by 1.07% on average. In the same weeks DBMF fell 0.35% on average, a down-week capture of 32.9%. Over the same 52 weeks DBMF returned +17.9% and a Treasury bill fund +3.7%, so it finished 14.3 percentage points ahead of cash.

MFUT

MFUT is a managed futures fund. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.54 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.74, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.74% the same way. In the same weeks MFUT fell 0.96% on average, a down-week capture of 89.9%. Over the same 52 weeks MFUT returned +22.8% and a Treasury bill fund +3.7%, so it finished 19.1 percentage points ahead of cash.

Questions people ask

Which moved less with the S&P 500, DBMF or MFUT?: Over the 52 weeks to Nov 4, 2026, DBMF’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.26 with the S&P 500 and MFUT’s +0.54, so DBMF moved less with the index.
Which did better when the S&P 500 fell, DBMF or MFUT?: In the 26 weeks the S&P 500 fell, by 1.07% a week on average, DBMF averaged −0.35% and MFUT −0.96%, so DBMF returned more in those weeks.
Which earned more than cash, DBMF or MFUT?: Over the same weeks, DBMF finished 14.3 percentage points ahead of cash and MFUT finished 19.1 percentage points ahead of cash. Cash here is BIL, a fund of Treasury bills.
Which is cheaper, DBMF or MFUT?: DBMF charges 0.85% a year and MFUT charges 0.89%, so DBMF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

DBMF vs HOLD DBMF vs KMLM DBMF vs ISMF DBMF vs ASMF MFUT vs TFPN MFUT vs RSBT MFUT vs PRAE MFUT vs RSST

Where to next

BIL, the T-bill fund these are measured against →SPY, the S&P 500 fund these are measured against →DBMF on its own →MFUT on its own →DBMF dividend history →MFUT dividend history →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

DBMF filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

DBMF prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

iMGP website ↗

MFUT filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

MFUT prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Cambria website ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, DBMF against MFUT, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/alternatives/dbmf-vs-mfut

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.