Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

MFUT vs WTMF: which moved less with stocks?

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, MFUT moved less with the S&P 500 than WTMF: correlation +0.29 against +0.54.

Cambria Chesapeake Pure Trend ETF and WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund.

+0.29MFUT correlation with the S&P 500
+0.54WTMF correlation with the S&P 500
−15.9%MFUT down-week capture
15.2%WTMF down-week capture

ETFIQ Diversifier Score: MFUT scores higher

How much does it diversify a stock portfolio?

MFUT 76.2WTMF 53.14.8, the lowest in this set98.0, the highest

A percentile among the 63 alternatives ETFs with a full year. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All alternatives ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

MFUTRose when the S&P 500 fell
SPY−1.24%MFUT+0.20%Average week when SPY fell: 22 of 52, year to Sep 18, 2026SPY−1.24%MFUT+0.20%Average week when SPY fell
WTMFFell 15% as much as the S&P 500
SPY−1.24%WTMF−0.19%Average week when SPY fell: 22 of 52, year to Sep 18, 2026SPY−1.24%WTMF−0.19%Average week when SPY fell

One strategy, two funds

MFUT and WTMF both run a managed futures strategy. Over the same 52 weeks to Sep 18, 2026, MFUT’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.29 with the S&P 500 and WTMF’s +0.54. In the 22 weeks the index fell, by 1.24% a week on average, MFUT averaged +0.20% and WTMF −0.19%. Over the same weeks, MFUT finished 27.5 percentage points ahead of cash and WTMF finished 11.3 points ahead of cash.

Performance, window by window

MFUT and WTMF over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnvs the S&P 500
MFUTWTMFMFUTWTMF
3 months+5.4%+1.8%+3.2 pts−0.4 pts
6 months+16.4%+8.0%−1.6 pts−10.0 pts
1 year+31.0%+15.5%+14.4 pts−1.1 pts
3 yearsnot published+32.6%not published−45.8 pts
Since launch+0.3%+21.4%−48.7 pts−665.4 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
MFUT and WTMF on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MFUT
Cambria Chesapeake Pure Trend ETF
Managed futures fund: follows price trends in futures on stocks, bonds, currencies and commodities, and can bet on falls as well as rises
WTMF
WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund
Managed futures fund: follows price trends in futures on stocks, bonds, currencies and commodities, and can bet on falls as well as rises
IssuerCambriaWisdomTree
StrategyManaged futuresManaged futures
Correlation with the S&P 500+0.29+0.54
Beta to the S&P 500+0.28+0.33
Down-week capture−15.9%15.2%
Average week when the S&P 500 fell+0.20%−0.19%
The S&P 500 in those weeks−1.24%−1.24%
Total return, same 52 weeks+31.1%+14.9%
Against T-bills, percentage points+27.5 pts+11.3 pts
Expense ratio1.18%0.66%
ListedMay 29, 2024Jan 5, 2011
Net assets$39m$235m

MFUT in plain words

MFUT is a managed futures fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.29 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.28, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.28% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 22 of those 52 weeks, by 1.24% on average. In the same weeks MFUT rose 0.20% on average, a down-week capture of −15.9%. Over the same 52 weeks MFUT returned +31.1% and a Treasury bill fund +3.6%, so it finished 27.5 percentage points ahead of cash.

WTMF in plain words

WTMF is a managed futures fund. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.54 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.33, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.33% the same way. In the same weeks WTMF fell 0.19% on average, a down-week capture of 15.2%. Over the same 52 weeks WTMF returned +14.9% and a Treasury bill fund +3.6%, so it finished 11.3 percentage points ahead of cash.

Questions people ask

Which moved less with the S&P 500, MFUT or WTMF?
Over the 52 weeks to Sep 18, 2026, MFUT’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.29 with the S&P 500 and WTMF’s +0.54, so MFUT moved less with the index.
Which did better when the S&P 500 fell, MFUT or WTMF?
In the 22 weeks the S&P 500 fell, by 1.24% a week on average, MFUT averaged +0.20% and WTMF −0.19%, so MFUT returned more in those weeks.
Which earned more than cash, MFUT or WTMF?
Over the same weeks, MFUT finished 27.5 percentage points ahead of cash and WTMF finished 11.3 percentage points ahead of cash. Cash here is BIL, a fund of Treasury bills.
Which is cheaper, MFUT or WTMF?
MFUT charges 1.18% a year and WTMF charges 0.66%, so WTMF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MFUT against WTMF, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MFUT against WTMF, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/alternatives/mfut-vs-wtmf Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources