Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

IMF vs MFUT: which moved less with stocks?

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, IMF moved less with the S&P 500 than MFUT: correlation +0.22 against +0.29.

Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF and Cambria Chesapeake Pure Trend ETF.

+0.22IMF correlation with the S&P 500
+0.29MFUT correlation with the S&P 500
−22.7%IMF down-week capture
−15.9%MFUT down-week capture

ETFIQ Diversifier Score: IMF scores higher

How much does it diversify a stock portfolio?

IMF 81MFUT 76.24.8, the lowest in this set98.0, the highest

A percentile among the 63 alternatives ETFs with a full year. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All alternatives ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

IMFRose when the S&P 500 fell
SPY−1.24%IMF+0.28%Average week when SPY fell: 22 of 52, year to Sep 18, 2026SPY−1.24%IMF+0.28%Average week when SPY fell
MFUTRose when the S&P 500 fell
SPY−1.24%MFUT+0.20%Average week when SPY fell: 22 of 52, year to Sep 18, 2026SPY−1.24%MFUT+0.20%Average week when SPY fell

One strategy, two funds

IMF and MFUT both run a managed futures strategy. Over the same 52 weeks to Sep 18, 2026, IMF’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.22 with the S&P 500 and MFUT’s +0.29. In the 22 weeks the index fell, by 1.24% a week on average, IMF averaged +0.28% and MFUT +0.20%. Over the same weeks, IMF finished 19.4 percentage points ahead of cash and MFUT finished 27.5 points ahead of cash.

Performance, window by window

IMF and MFUT over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnvs the S&P 500
IMFMFUTIMFMFUT
3 months+4.1%+5.4%+1.9 pts+3.2 pts
6 months+7.7%+16.4%−10.4 pts−1.6 pts
1 year+23.1%+31.0%+6.5 pts+14.4 pts
Since launch+7.4%+0.3%−29.6 pts−48.7 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
IMF and MFUT on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IMF
Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF
Managed futures fund: follows price trends in futures on stocks, bonds, currencies and commodities, and can bet on falls as well as rises
MFUT
Cambria Chesapeake Pure Trend ETF
Managed futures fund: follows price trends in futures on stocks, bonds, currencies and commodities, and can bet on falls as well as rises
IssuerInvescoCambria
StrategyManaged futuresManaged futures
Correlation with the S&P 500+0.22+0.29
Beta to the S&P 500+0.12+0.28
Down-week capture−22.7%−15.9%
Average week when the S&P 500 fell+0.28%+0.20%
The S&P 500 in those weeks−1.24%−1.24%
Total return, same 52 weeks+23.1%+31.1%
Against T-bills, percentage points+19.4 pts+27.5 pts
Expense ratio0.65%1.18%
ListedMar 19, 2025May 29, 2024
Net assets$319m$39m

IMF in plain words

IMF is a managed futures fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.22 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.12, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.12% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 22 of those 52 weeks, by 1.24% on average. In the same weeks IMF rose 0.28% on average, a down-week capture of −22.7%. Over the same 52 weeks IMF returned +23.1% and a Treasury bill fund +3.6%, so it finished 19.4 percentage points ahead of cash.

MFUT in plain words

MFUT is a managed futures fund. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.29 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.28, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.28% the same way. In the same weeks MFUT rose 0.20% on average, a down-week capture of −15.9%. Over the same 52 weeks MFUT returned +31.1% and a Treasury bill fund +3.6%, so it finished 27.5 percentage points ahead of cash.

Questions people ask

Which moved less with the S&P 500, IMF or MFUT?
Over the 52 weeks to Sep 18, 2026, IMF’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.22 with the S&P 500 and MFUT’s +0.29, so IMF moved less with the index.
Which did better when the S&P 500 fell, IMF or MFUT?
In the 22 weeks the S&P 500 fell, by 1.24% a week on average, IMF averaged +0.28% and MFUT +0.20%, so IMF returned more in those weeks.
Which earned more than cash, IMF or MFUT?
Over the same weeks, IMF finished 19.4 percentage points ahead of cash and MFUT finished 27.5 percentage points ahead of cash. Cash here is BIL, a fund of Treasury bills.
Which is cheaper, IMF or MFUT?
IMF charges 0.65% a year and MFUT charges 1.18%, so IMF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IMF against MFUT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IMF against MFUT, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/alternatives/imf-vs-mfut Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources