Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

CTA vs FMF: which moved less with stocks?

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, CTA moved less with the S&P 500 than FMF: correlation −0.26 against +0.18.

Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF and First Trust Managed Futures Strategy Fund.

−0.26CTA correlation with the S&P 500
+0.18FMF correlation with the S&P 500
−78.5%CTA down-week capture
−16.2%FMF down-week capture

ETFIQ Diversifier Score: CTA scores higher

How much does it diversify a stock portfolio?

CTA 95.3FMF 81.84.8, the lowest in this set98.0, the highest

A percentile among the 63 alternatives ETFs with a full year. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All alternatives ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

CTARose when the S&P 500 fell
SPY−1.24%CTA+0.97%Average week when SPY fell: 22 of 52, year to Sep 18, 2026SPY−1.24%CTA+0.97%Average week when SPY fell
FMFRose when the S&P 500 fell
SPY−1.24%FMF+0.20%Average week when SPY fell: 22 of 52, year to Sep 18, 2026SPY−1.24%FMF+0.20%Average week when SPY fell

One strategy, two funds

CTA and FMF both run a managed futures strategy. Over the same 52 weeks to Sep 18, 2026, CTA’s weekly returns had a correlation of −0.26 with the S&P 500 and FMF’s +0.18. In the 22 weeks the index fell, by 1.24% a week on average, CTA averaged +0.97% and FMF +0.20%. Over the same weeks, CTA finished 10.1 percentage points ahead of cash and FMF finished 11.7 points ahead of cash.

Performance, window by window

CTA and FMF over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnvs the S&P 500
CTAFMFCTAFMF
3 months+11.3%+4.9%+9.0 pts+2.6 pts
6 months+1.2%+6.9%−16.9 pts−11.1 pts
1 year+13.8%+15.7%−2.8 pts−0.9 pts
3 years+31.9%+21.0%−46.5 pts−57.4 pts
Since launch+52.5%+33.5%−42.5 pts−424.0 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
CTA and FMF on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CTA
Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF
Managed futures fund: follows price trends in futures on stocks, bonds, currencies and commodities, and can bet on falls as well as rises
FMF
First Trust Managed Futures Strategy Fund
Managed futures fund: follows price trends in futures on stocks, bonds, currencies and commodities, and can bet on falls as well as rises
IssuerSimplifyFirst Trust
StrategyManaged futuresManaged futures
Correlation with the S&P 500−0.26+0.18
Beta to the S&P 500−0.47+0.12
Down-week capture−78.5%−16.2%
Average week when the S&P 500 fell+0.97%+0.20%
The S&P 500 in those weeks−1.24%−1.24%
Total return, same 52 weeks+13.7%+15.3%
Against T-bills, percentage points+10.1 pts+11.7 pts
Expense ratio0.75%0.98%
ListedMar 8, 2022Aug 2, 2013
Net assets$1.5bn$288m

CTA in plain words

CTA is a managed futures fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of −0.26 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of −0.47, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.47% the other way. The S&P 500 fell in 22 of those 52 weeks, by 1.24% on average. In the same weeks CTA rose 0.97% on average, a down-week capture of −78.5%. Over the same 52 weeks CTA returned +13.7% and a Treasury bill fund +3.6%, so it finished 10.1 percentage points ahead of cash.

FMF in plain words

FMF is a managed futures fund. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.18 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.12, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.12% the same way. In the same weeks FMF rose 0.20% on average, a down-week capture of −16.2%. Over the same 52 weeks FMF returned +15.3% and a Treasury bill fund +3.6%, so it finished 11.7 percentage points ahead of cash.

Questions people ask

Which moved less with the S&P 500, CTA or FMF?
Over the 52 weeks to Sep 18, 2026, CTA’s weekly returns had a correlation of −0.26 with the S&P 500 and FMF’s +0.18, so CTA moved less with the index.
Which did better when the S&P 500 fell, CTA or FMF?
In the 22 weeks the S&P 500 fell, by 1.24% a week on average, CTA averaged +0.97% and FMF +0.20%, so CTA returned more in those weeks.
Which earned more than cash, CTA or FMF?
Over the same weeks, CTA finished 10.1 percentage points ahead of cash and FMF finished 11.7 percentage points ahead of cash. Cash here is BIL, a fund of Treasury bills.
Which is cheaper, CTA or FMF?
CTA charges 0.75% a year and FMF charges 0.98%, so CTA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CTA against FMF, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CTA against FMF, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/alternatives/cta-vs-fmf Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources